Unpaired Electrons: Reif's Thermo Book Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of unpaired electrons as described in Reif's thermodynamics book, specifically addressing whether it is possible to have more than one unpaired electron in a substance with magnetic atoms. The scope includes theoretical interpretations and applications related to atomic structure and electron configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant interprets "unpaired" as indicating a single electron in a state with no opposing spin, suggesting that having more than one unpaired electron is impossible.
  • Another participant references Hund's rules, indicating that an atom can have multiple unpaired electrons in different angular momentum states.
  • A different participant mentions that unpaired electrons are evident in the electron configurations of various atoms, providing examples like Carbon and Nitrogen.
  • One participant describes the filling of electron states, noting that an even number of electrons results in no unpaired electrons, while an odd number results in one unpaired electron.
  • Another participant clarifies that for Carbon, the two unpaired electrons in the p orbital are in different angular momentum states, leading to a total spin of 1 rather than 0.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of unpaired electrons, with some asserting that multiple unpaired electrons are possible while others maintain that only one can exist under certain conditions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the definitions and implications of unpaired electrons.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of unpaired electrons and the assumptions made about electron configurations. The interpretations of Hund's rules and their implications for unpaired electrons are also not fully resolved.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
In Reif's thermo book, one can read

"Consider a substance which contains n magnetics atoms per unit volumes and which is placed in an external magnetic hield B. Assume that each atom has spin 1/2 (corresponding to one unpaired electron) and an intrinsic magnetic moment of \mu."

He makes it sound like it's possible to have more than one unpaired electron. Is this so? I interpret "unpaired" as "there is one electron in a state r and spin up (resp. down) such that there are no electrons in state r with spin down (resp. up). But as soon as you add one more electrons, it will get in state r with spin down (resp. up) so there are no more unpaired electrons. Hence it's impossible to have more than 1 unpaired. Is this how it work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure if I understand you completely but... look up Hund's rules. An atom can have more than one unpaired electron. They're in different angular momentum states though.
 
Surely if you've ever studied chemistry you might know that "unpaired electrons" occur when writing the electron configurations for various atoms. For instance, the Carbon atom has 2 unpaired electrons, N has 3, etc.

Daniel.
 
What is an unpaired electron then?

I've said what I remember from chemistry. You fill up the states two by two since an up and a down can occupy the same state. If there is an even number of electrons, there there is no unpaired electrons; if the number is odd there is one.
 
Nope, Hund rules make it that the Carbon atom which had 6 electrons altogether have the configuration

1s2 2s2 2p2

, but the 2 electrons in the "p" orbital are uncoupled (i.e. in different total angular momentul states), meaning that the spins are not antiparallel in the same orbital (p_{x}), but are alligned & parallel in the 2 orbitals:2p_{x} & 2p_{y}, rendering the total spin 1, instead of 0.

Daniel.
 
Ah, I see, thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
869
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K