vroom
- 4
- 0
can't one interpret mass, simply as a proportionality constant, in a sense the cause for inertia. ( that's inertial mass )
The discussion revolves around the concept of mass, exploring its definition, implications, and the relationship between mass and other physical properties. Participants question the meaning of mass as "the amount of substance" and seek clarity on how mass can be compared across different materials, such as butter and platinum-iridium alloy. The conversation touches on theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical aspects of mass.
Participants express a range of views on the definition and implications of mass, with no clear consensus reached. Some agree on certain aspects of mass's relationship to fundamental particles, while others challenge the adequacy of common definitions and analogies.
The discussion highlights the limitations of definitions and the complexity of the concept of mass, particularly when considering different contexts such as chemistry and advanced physics. Participants acknowledge the need for a solid understanding of underlying principles to engage with deeper questions about mass.
I believe they still know nothing about Higgs field & particles.DaveC426913 said:Mass is the drag that an object experiences by its resistance to the Higgs field.