MHB Unsolved Challenge: Natural logarithm and Exponent

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove $e^{-x}\le \ln(e^x-x-\ln x)$ for $x>0$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Partial answer

Let $ x = x_0\approx 0.5671432$ be the point at which $e^{-x} = x$ (in terms of the Lambert function, $x_0 = W_0(1)$). Then $\ln x_0 = -x_0$, and so $\ln(e^{x_0} - x_0 - \ln x_0) = \ln(e^{x_0}) = x_0 = e^{-x_0}$. Thus at the point $x_0$ the two functions $e^{-x}$ and $\ln(e^x - x - \ln x)$ are equal.

Now let $f(x) = \ln(e^x - x - \ln x)$. Then $$f'(x) = \frac{e^x - 1 - \frac1x}{e^x - x - \ln x} = \frac{-1 + \bigl(e^x - \frac1x\bigr)}{e^x - (x+\ln x)}.$$ When $x = x_0$, both of the expressions in parentheses in that last fraction vanish. Therefore $f'(x_0) = \dfrac{-1}{e^{x_0}} = -e^{-x_0}$, which is the same as the derivative of $e^{-x}$ at $x_0$.

When $x>x_0$, $e^x - \frac1x$ and $x + \ln x$ are both positive. So in the expression for $f'(x)$ the numerator is greater than $-1$ and the denominator is less than $e^x$, and so $f'(x) > -e^{-x}$. Conversely, when $x<x_0$, $e^x - \frac1x$ and $x + \ln x$ are both negative and so $f'(x) < -e^{-x}$. It follows that $x_0$ is a local minimum for the function $f(x) - e^{-x}$. Therefore $\ln(e^x - x - \ln x) \geqslant e^{-x}$ in the neighbourhood of $x_0$.

Once you get away from the neighbourhood of $x_0$ it ought to be relatively easy to see that $\ln(e^x - x - \ln x)$ is greater than $e^{-x}$, but I don't have the patience or energy to pursue that part of the problem.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top