Uranium power/weight ratio in fission reactors

In summary, based on these figures, it would take around 4800 metric tons of uranium ore to generate the 1000 million watts of power per day that is needed to sustain the population of an interstellar ark for 10,000 years.
  • #1
AA Institute
21
0
Hi,

I have a couple of more questions for all the kind and learned people here.

Are there any (approx) benchmarks for quantifying how much uranium ore (kg) is going to be rquired in order to generate a given amount of electricity over a specific length of time? Let me clarify...

Hypothetically speaking, if I wanted to generate 1000 million watts of power per day (10^9), continuously, over a period of 10,000 years, how much uranium ore (mass, in kg) would I need to dig out of the ground in order to satisfy this demand?

What would be a technical definition or name for this kind of power/weight assessment?

Thanks for any suggestions.

AA
______________________________________________________________
http://www.publishedauthors.net/aa_spaceagent/
(PS & off topic: In case anyone is wondering why, I want to power the lighting inside my interstellar ark, the 'Centauri Princess', featured in my novel : First Ark to Alpha Centauri!) :smile:
_______________________________________________________________
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
AA Institute said:
Are there any (approx) benchmarks for quantifying how much uranium ore (kg) is going to be rquired in order to generate a given amount of electricity over a specific length of time?
Yes

AA Institute said:
Hypothetically speaking, if I wanted to generate 1000 million watts of power per day (10^9), continuously, over a period of 10,000 years, how much uranium ore (mass, in kg) would I need to dig out of the ground in order to satisfy this demand?

What would be a technical definition or name for this kind of power/weight assessment?
The term of Watts/kgU is specific power. One can also calculate power density in the fuel Watts/m3.

However, the conventional term is burnup, GWd/tU or GWd/kgU or MWd/kgU, which describes the energy produced per unit mass of U. Some use the mass of UO2, as in MWd/kgUO2.
To get the mass of U, one need only determine the energy and time over which the energy is generated.

Currently in many commercial power reactors (LWRs), typical maximum rod average burnup is about 55-60 GWd/tU (Although fuel can conceivably reach about 70-75 GWd/tU without problems), where 1 tU = 1000 kgU. In fast reactors, burnups of 100-200 GWd/tU are possible.

The principal technical issues with respect to LWR fuel include corrosion of the cladding and rod internal pressure. The objective here is to make sure that fission products are retained in the fuel rod throughout operation and subsequent handling.
 
  • #3
Thanks. I suppose everything will depend upon how much power consumption will take place. Since the interior surface area of my ark will be of approx. 600 square kilometres, and the population will be around 3,000 people (on average) along the 50,000 year long journey (!), I wonder if there are any Earthly parallels to compare this with?

I wonder if there are any figures available for the total yearly electricity consumption of a small-town community of 3,000 people somewhere in N. America...(how much power wattage they consume over 1 year)...
 
  • #4
AA Institute said:
I wonder if there are any figures available for the total yearly electricity consumption of a small-town community of 3,000 people somewhere in N. America...(how much power wattage they consume over 1 year)...

Well "somewhere" can be a broad range of electrical usage. Hill towns in Mexico might compare decently enough to a little town in the US or Canada but the larger the population in a city, the larger the discrepencies get!

If you'll go to the CIA world factbook, you can determine the following figures.

Per capita electrical generation in the US: ~12200kwh/year
Per capita electrical generation in Canada: ~14800kwh/year
Per capita electrical generation in Mexico: ~1780kwh/year

Also, I believe it takes a ton of uranium ore to make 1 pound of the type of uranium used in nuclear power plants. Wonder where Morbios is, bet he could figure this stuff out off the top of his head.
 

What is the power/weight ratio in fission reactors?

The power/weight ratio in fission reactors is a measure of the amount of energy that can be produced per unit of weight of uranium. It is typically measured in megawatts per kilogram (MW/kg).

How does the power/weight ratio affect the efficiency of fission reactors?

The power/weight ratio is directly related to the efficiency of fission reactors. A higher power/weight ratio means that a reactor can generate more energy using a smaller amount of uranium, making it more efficient.

What factors affect the power/weight ratio in fission reactors?

The power/weight ratio in fission reactors is affected by several factors, including the type and grade of uranium used, the design and size of the reactor, and the efficiency of the control mechanisms used to regulate the nuclear reaction.

How does the power/weight ratio in fission reactors compare to other sources of energy?

Fission reactors have a higher power/weight ratio compared to most other sources of energy, such as fossil fuels or renewable sources like solar or wind. This means that they can produce more energy per unit of weight of fuel, making them a more efficient option.

Is the power/weight ratio in fission reactors improving over time?

Yes, the power/weight ratio in fission reactors has been improving over time as advancements in technology and design have allowed for more efficient use of uranium. However, there is still ongoing research and development to further improve this ratio and make fission reactors even more efficient.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
46
Views
12K
Replies
10
Views
12K
Replies
12
Views
11K
Back
Top