Uranium238 vs U235, which are true?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kibbel
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparison of the speed of sound in uranium-238 (U238) versus uranium-235 (U235) due to their differing neutron counts. It is established that while both isotopes have the same number of protons and nearly identical electron clouds, the interatomic distance remains the same, as it is influenced by electron cloud size rather than nuclear mass. The effective stiffness of the interatomic bonds, modeled as springs, does not differ between the two isotopes, confirming that the primary factor affecting sound speed is mass. Therefore, the speed of sound in U238 is lower than in U235 due to its greater mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic structure and isotopes
  • Basic knowledge of interatomic forces and bonding
  • Familiarity with the concept of sound speed in solids
  • Knowledge of mass and density relationships in materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between atomic mass and sound speed in solids
  • Study the properties of interatomic forces and their impact on material stiffness
  • Explore the concept of density and its effect on atomic structure
  • Learn about the behavior of different isotopes in physical and chemical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or materials science, researchers studying isotopic effects, and professionals in nuclear engineering or materials engineering will benefit from this discussion.

Kibbel
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Uranium-238 (U238) has three more neutrons than uranium-235 (U235). Compared to the speed of sound in a bar of U235, is the speed of sound in a bar of U238 higher, lower, or the same? There are several factors that play a role.

(a) Chemically, the atoms of these two isotopes behave in essentially identical ways, since the number of protons (92) is identical and the clouds of 92 electrons are nearly identical. The interatomic distance, and the effective "stiffness" of the interatomic bond, both depend on the chemical properties of the atoms. Therefore, which of the following statements are true?

1. The interatomic distance is the same for the two isotopes, because it depends on the size of the electron cloud, not the nuclear mass.

2. An atom with more mass in the nucleus is bigger, so the distance between neighboring atoms is larger.

3.The effective stiffness of the interatomic "spring" is the same in the two isotopes, since this "spring" is a model for the interactions of the outer electrons, which are the same for different isotopes of the same atom.

4.The effective stiffness of the interatomic "spring" is greater for U238 because the mass is greater.


Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it was that the interatomic distance in between the two are the same, (#1). I am not sure whether it has to do with the electron, but I was pretty sure that it doesn't have to do with the mass. this is why i didn't check 2 or 4 either. Because I know two things can have the same mass, but they don't neccissarily have to be bigger, because the density might be different. Or maybe the entire thing is different on the microscopic level?

can someone help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of the atoms comprising the metal as little balls connected to other little balls with springs. What two parameters determine the speed at which a vibration travels through this mass/spring web?

As is pointed out, in the case of U235 and U238 there is no difference in "spring" constant, only a difference of mass.

AM
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
20K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
42K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
545