Wave Particle Duality & Uncertainty Principle: Which Came First?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the historical relationship between wave-particle duality and the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics (QM). Wave-particle duality, originating from Louis de Broglie's 1924 PhD thesis, predates Heisenberg's formulation of the uncertainty principle between 1925 and 1927. The uncertainty principle is derived from matrix mechanics, which Heisenberg developed, and is a theorem concerning non-commuting observables. The wave-particle duality is often misrepresented, as it does not accurately describe the nature of quantum phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Familiarity with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
  • Knowledge of matrix mechanics and its historical context
  • Awareness of wave mechanics and Schrödinger's equation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical development of quantum mechanics, focusing on Heisenberg and de Broglie's contributions
  • Study the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics as presented by John von Neumann
  • Explore the implications of non-commuting observables in quantum theory
  • Investigate the differences between wave mechanics and matrix mechanics in quantum physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators in quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the historical development of quantum theories will benefit from this discussion.

RQwtq
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Which of them comes first,(I mean the concept or the theory)? Did Heisenberg come up with the idea of uncertainty principle because of the discover of the wave particle duality?

Thanks for paying attention~
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "wave-particle" duality? It's usually a heuristic, rather than a specific technical term. Do you mean ##[x,p]=i\hbar##?
 
Is it true that waves sometimes behave like particles and particles sometime behave like waves? If it's true, that is what I meant...
 
The wave particle duality is actually incorrect - its neither wave nor particle - its quantum stuff. Concepts like that were part of the ideas prior to the full birth of QM that happened in December 1926 when Dirac came up with his transformation theory that basically goes by the name QM today.

The uncertainty principle follows from that fully developed theory - its a theorem about non-commuting observables.

Historically Heisenberg came up with the uncertainty principle 1925-1927. The wave particle duality probably dates from De-Broglies Phd thesis in 1924 - so it likely came first. But I want to emphasise its incorrect.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
I'm working on a chemistry video for homework. I want to say that it is wave-particle duality that led Heisenberg to come up with the idea. But, really, I'm not sure about it, so I'm here to ask...Now I'm even more confused:confused:
 
RQwtq said:
I'm working on a chemistry video for homework. I want to say that it is wave-particle duality that led Heisenberg to come up with the idea. But, really, I'm not sure about it, so I'm here to ask...Now I'm even more confused:confused:

It wasn't.

It followed from the matrix mechanics he developed about that time.

The wave particle idea led to Schroedinger's equation and wave mechanics.

They were two different versions of QM.

It was suspected they were in fact the same theory.

Dirac succeeded in showing that in December 1926:
http://www.lajpe.org/may08/09_Carlos_Madrid.pdf

There were a couple of mathematical technicalities that needed elaboration due to what's called the Dirac Delta function. Von-Neumann fixed that issue in 1932 when he published his famous Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Ok, that's much easier to be understood. Thank you
 
RQwtq said:
Is it true that waves sometimes behave like particles and particles sometime behave like waves? If it's true, that is what I meant...

Yes that's true - but its not a generally applicable principle because there are many circumstances where its neither.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K