some of us will want to follow this http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2006/09/connes_on_spectral_geometry_of.html I always did think that "noncommutative geometry" was a little misleading and what it really had to do with was Gelfandry. Reformism in language is seldom needed and rarely works, but in this case I think Urs is right when he tries to make us call Connes stuff "SPECTRAL geometry" Well this Urs thing was just posted today 6 September. I hope it helps. I could use some help. It is going to be continued.