US Politics & ISIS: Hope for the Best or Natural Selection?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WhatIsGravity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    politics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the complex dynamics of ISIS, U.S. involvement in the Middle East, and the implications of these interactions on both sides. Participants explore ideological underpinnings, cultural influences, and the consequences of military actions, touching on themes of radicalization, human rights, and historical context.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares personal experiences in Iraq and Saudi Arabia, suggesting that ISIS may desire increased U.S. involvement to attract more radical recruits.
  • Another participant describes ISIS as a fascist ideology that rejects democracy and promotes a binary worldview, emphasizing the role of terror as a political strategy.
  • A participant references a documentary on ISIS, suggesting it provides valuable insights into the topic.
  • Some participants argue that hyper-masculinity and American militarism contribute to the appeal of ISIS among recruits, while also questioning U.S. military actions and their humanitarian impact.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for ISIS to provoke the U.S. into committing atrocities, which they could use to justify their actions.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about ISIS's expectations regarding the outcome of their conflict with the West, seeking affirmation or correction of their understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the motivations and implications of ISIS's actions, with no clear consensus on the best approach to address the situation or the nature of the conflict. Disagreements persist regarding the interpretation of U.S. actions and the ideological framework of ISIS.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the motivations of ISIS and the consequences of U.S. military actions, which may not be universally accepted. The conversation reflects a variety of perspectives without resolving the complexities involved.

WhatIsGravity
Messages
47
Reaction score
6
I spent much of last year in Iraq (Kurdistan), and most of this year in Saudi, mainly spending my time hanging out in remote places; little villages. From what I saw and heard and experienced, ISIS wants the US to get more involved... cause that means more radical recruits- on both sides.

Bring it all to a head, and let the chips fall where they may- natural selection? Or hope for the best, like Obama seems wanting to do.

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ISIS is a functionally fascist ideology. It presents the idea that everyone must purify themselves (avoid shirk) and avoid placing any aspect of life near the importance of God. Thus petty ideas such as democracy are rejected.

This stands in stark contrast to mundane life. Family, business and science all need to subjugate themselves to the state, which they refer to as jihad. (Other Muslims mean different things by jihad.) Complacency is their main enemy.

So yes, they seek conflict wherever they can get it. They seek to reduce the world to a binary set. Do what they say is right, or die.

The problem is, there will be shirkers, defined "as anyone less holy than me". They will and must kill until only the most devout person is left.

The willingness to use terror on the village level has always been an effective political strategy and difficult to deal with. It's hard to act justly against fear and intimidation, and any injustice will be used to justify their actions. When added to the inherent injustice of Western politics it becomes nearly unbeatable.

The best defense is strong historical political education. Previous Muslim fascist regimes should be expounded. It's important that people know how previous "utopias" ended. The deliberate dumbing down of our education system has to stop.

And it wouldn't hurt if we cleaned up our own political corruption. The less ammunition we give them, the better.

Unfortunately we are becoming ignorant for powerful reasons. Corruption works, at least for the corrupt. I'm not optimistic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd and 1oldman2
HBO recently had a documentary on ISIS. Pretty interesting heavy stuff. If you are still active on this forum/topic I would venture to seek it out.
 
I think there are two causes to these problems. The first is hyper-masculinity. I think the muslims that join ISIS are creating a Fight Club-like situation for themselves. Also, American culture puts an emphasis on strength, guns and militarism too.

The actions of ISIS are deplorable and they need to be defeated. But the United States also has some human rights questions that it needs to answer. Yes, radical muslims bomb innocent people in the west, but how many children in the middle east have we bombed? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands?
 
Derek Francis said:
The actions of ISIS are deplorable and they need to be defeated. But the United States also has some human rights questions that it needs to answer. Yes, radical muslims bomb innocent people in the west, but how many children in the middle east have we bombed? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands?

The actions of Daesh are deplorable but their apocalyptic death cult ideology means they don't care 'how many children in the middle east have we bombed'. They expect to lose the great apostate/infidel war and are desperately attempting with these terrorist acts to make us commit mass atrocities to that end.
 
nsaspook said:
They expect to lose the great apostate/infidel war and are desperately attempting with these terrorist acts to make us commit mass atrocities to that end.

From what I've read they do expect to win. They do want the West to attack them as you describe because they want a world religious war. They believe that once civilization is thus destroyed they will be in the best position to take over the world because they believe they can stand up to the hardships and we are to weak. But I can't find my source for that and hope someone can affirm this or disabuse me of my delusion.
 
Derek Francis said:
but how many children in the middle east have we bombed? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands?
But we didn't seek out children to bomb and this is a necropost, so it is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mheslep

Similar threads

  • · Replies 298 ·
10
Replies
298
Views
73K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
9K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K