Use Archimede's Spiral For Accelerate An Object.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerate Spiral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the feasibility of using an Archimedean spiral to accelerate an object, examining the forces involved and the energy requirements for such a mechanism. It includes theoretical considerations and assumptions about friction and energy consumption.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that an Archimedean spiral could accelerate an object by applying a perpendicular force, suggesting that this could allow the spiral to turn without energy input.
  • Another participant counters that since the spiral is not circular, a perpendicular force would still require work, implying energy consumption.
  • A later reply suggests that using multiple centers might reduce energy requirements, but acknowledges that some energy is still necessary.
  • One participant argues that if the object is on a frictionless surface, theoretically, an infinitesimal amount of energy could move the object any distance, regardless of the spiral. However, they note that friction would necessitate energy proportional to the mass and distance moved, regardless of the spiral's presence.
  • It is concluded by one participant that the spiral does not provide any advantage in terms of energy efficiency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the energy implications of using an Archimedean spiral for acceleration, with some suggesting potential energy savings while others argue that energy consumption is unavoidable.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about friction, the nature of forces acting on the spiral and object, and the definition of energy efficiency are not fully resolved, leading to varying interpretations of the spiral's utility.

lba
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Is it possible to help to accelerate an object with an Archimede Spiral ? We can apply a force F perpendiculary to the spiral, like this if we want to turn the spiral in its center we don't need energy. If we want to accelerate an object near the spiral, we apply a force F to the spiral, the spiral apply the same force in the contrary direction. The object accelerate. The spiral can turn without energy if the force F is perpendiculary to the surface (it's possible with an Archimede Spiral). Like the object accelerate, if we want always a contact between the spiral and the object, we need to accelerate the spiral, but this don't require more energy. In this case what is the energy need for accelerate the object ? It is the same without spiral ? Why ?
 

Attachments

  • Archimede Spiral 2.png
    Archimede Spiral 2.png
    27.1 KB · Views: 575
Physics news on Phys.org
The spiral is not a circle, so you can't have F perpendicular to it in this arrangement. So there will be some work of F, and energy will be consumed.
 
You're right but if I use 4 centers like the figure show, it's not possible to turn the spiral without energy ? It's an approximation and a little energy is needed but less I think.
 

Attachments

  • 4 centers.png
    4 centers.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 448
lba said:
You're right but if I use 4 centers like the figure show, it's not possible to turn the spiral without energy ? It's an approximation and a little energy is needed but less I think.

If the object to move is on a frictionless surface, then, theoretically, you need an infinitely small energy and infinite time to move the object to any distance, with or without the spiral. If, however, there is friction, then the force of friction will do work that is proportional to the mass of the object and the distance to move, and you cannot spend less energy than that, again, with or without the spiral.

All in all, the spiral gives you nothing in terms of energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K