Use of an Impact Test in the cross section design of a component

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on utilizing Charpy impact test data for designing an emergency stop valve that operates quickly, with a closing time of 20-30 milliseconds. The test data indicates that a notched specimen absorbs 45 Joules of energy, while the spring mechanism provides only 30 Joules. Experts emphasize that these energy values cannot be directly compared due to the different nature of the components. The recommended approach is to build a prototype, conduct extensive testing, and iterate on the design based on observed failure modes, rather than relying solely on theoretical analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Charpy impact testing and its significance in material selection.
  • Knowledge of emergency stop valve mechanisms and their operational requirements.
  • Familiarity with prototype development and testing methodologies.
  • Awareness of various failure modes in mechanical components, including creep and wear.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the procedures for estimating impact stresses in mechanical designs.
  • Learn about different materials with high impact strength suitable for valve applications.
  • Explore prototype testing techniques and best practices for mechanical components.
  • Investigate failure modes in mechanical systems to enhance design robustness.
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, product designers, and anyone involved in the design and testing of high-performance machinery, particularly those focused on impact resistance and failure analysis.

SurajS
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
If I have impact test data showing energy absorbed by notched specimen, how do I utilize this data while designing. In my case, i am trying to design the valve which closes by striking on valve seat, how do i use the impact test results for this design?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assuming that you have a part that is subject to impact and that breaks under use, then one (not the only) option is to redesign the part using a material with increased impact strength. Some typical parts where this is a concern are the hammer mechanism in an impact wrench, cold chisels, and firing pins.

Companies that build high performance machines will sometimes have material specifications that include notched impact strength. The rest of us try to avoid impact where possible, and will focus our design efforts on reducing or eliminating impact. I have over 20 years experience at designing high performance machines, and have learned that using material with high impact strength is a last resort. When parts are impacting, the machine is noisy and vibrates a lot.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
jrmichler said:
Assuming that you have a part that is subject to impact and that breaks under use, then one (not the only) option is to redesign the part using a material with increased impact strength. Some typical parts where this is a concern are the hammer mechanism in an impact wrench, cold chisels, and firing pins.

Companies that build high performance machines will sometimes have material specifications that include notched impact strength. The rest of us try to avoid impact where possible, and will focus our design efforts on reducing or eliminating impact. I have over 20 years experience at designing high performance machines, and have learned that using material with high impact strength is a last resort. When parts are impacting, the machine is noisy and vibrates a lot.
I understand your concern, but in my case it is about emergency stop valve. So action of valve is very fast (20-30 millisec). Let me rephrase the question as:
Charpy impact test data (notch (2mm * 45 degree) specimen with 10*10*55 mm size) shows energy absorbed= 45 Joules , and energy available in spring (spring closes the valve) is 30 J, How can I correlate these two energies?
 
SurajS said:
Charpy impact test data (notch (2mm * 45 degree) specimen with 10*10*55 mm size) shows energy absorbed= 45 Joules , and energy available in spring (spring closes the valve) is 30 J, How can I correlate these two energies?
You don't. The parts are completely different, so the respective energy values cannot be directly compared.

I have designed parts comparable to what you describe. While there are published procedures for estimating impact stresses, the best approach is to build a prototype and test it. If an emergency stop valve has a design life of, say, 10 stops, then test it for 1000 cycles. If anything wears out or breaks, redesign and restart the test from scratch.

Make the first prototype from materials that seem reasonable. The testing will tell you if you need a better design or better materials. Keep in mind that fracture is only one of several different possible failure modes. Possible failure modes include creep, yielding, corrosion, stress corrosion cracking, spalling, wear, galling, and others. You can study the problem forever (paralysis by analysis) and still miss a failure mode, or you can build a prototype, test it, and find out. This is a case where test it and find out is faster, cheaper, and better than paralysis by analysis.
 
Thank you for information!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
925
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K