Use of statistics in experiment

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the estimation of random error in a single measurement using a formula that requires multiple data points. Questions arise about the validity of applying this formula to a single measurement, as it relies on the concept of variance, which is not defined for n=1. Participants clarify that a single measurement cannot exhibit a spread, thus making the variance conceptually irrelevant in that context. The correct approach involves using the sample average of existing data for predictions about new measurements. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the limitations of statistical formulas when applied to single data points.
Astudious
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I have seen that "the best estimate for the random error σ(X) in a single measurement is given by

σ(X)2 ≈ 1/(n-1) * ∑((xi-μ)2) where the sum is over all i"

I have two questions about this: firstly, how can this pertain to a "single measurement" if it requires the data from multiple measurements (x1, x2, x3, ... xi)? Secondly, this seems to correspond to the sample variance - wouldn't it be a more accurate estimate of the value of X's random error to convert to the variance of the population of X as a whole?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Astudious said:
I have seen that "the best estimate for the random error σ(X) in a single measurement is given by

Where did you see this?

If you look at your equation and plug in n = 1, is the variance defined?
 
I don't see where it says anything about the variance determined from a single measurement in that article. Where did you see that?
 
If you want to use several data points that you already have to predict what will happen for a new or unknown single data point, that is the equation you should use.

PS, The correct equation uses the sample average of the existing data in place of μ. If some how you know μ, you can use it, but divide by n rather than n-1.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K