Use of tensors for dielectric permittivity and magnetic permeability

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of tensors for dielectric permittivity (\mathbf{\epsilon}) and magnetic permeability (\mathbf{\mu}) in the context of electric and magnetic fields. It clarifies that while matrices can represent these properties in specific coordinate systems, tensors are more general and do not require a defined coordinate system. This distinction is crucial because tensors can operate on vectors to produce other vectors, maintaining their relevance across various contexts in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric and magnetic fields
  • Familiarity with vector mathematics
  • Knowledge of tensor calculus
  • Basic concepts of constitutive relations in electromagnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of tensors in electromagnetism
  • Learn about the differences between tensors and matrices in mathematical physics
  • Explore the role of constitutive relations in non-linear and non-homogeneous media
  • Investigate practical applications of tensors in materials science and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and materials scientists who are working with electromagnetic fields and require a deeper understanding of tensor mathematics in complex media.

EmilyRuck
Messages
134
Reaction score
6
Hello!
In the study of electric and magnetic fields, two equations are called the constitutive relations of the medium (the vacuum, for example):

\mathbf{D} = \mathbf{\epsilon} \cdot \mathbf{E}\\<br /> \mathbf{B} = \mathbf{\mu} \cdot \mathbf{H}

But in a generic medium (non linear, non isotropic, non homogeneous) \mathbf{\epsilon} and \mathbf{\mu} are tensors. Now, why not matrices with dimension 3x3? \mathbf{E} and \mathbf{H} are "simple" three-dimensional vectors. I know that a matrix is a particular case of a tensor, but so why do we never use the term "matrix" in this context?
A matrix could exist only if a particolar system of coordinates is defined, whereas a tensor can always exist: is it the reason for calling \mathbf{\epsilon} and \mathbf{\mu} tensors and not just matrices?
Thank you anyway!

Emily
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Emily! :smile:
EmilyRuck said:
A matrix could exist only if a particolar system of coordinates is defined, whereas a tensor can always exist: is it the reason for calling \mathbf{\epsilon} and \mathbf{\mu} tensors and not just matrices?

Yes, a tensor is an operator with an input and an output …

you put one vector in, another vector (not necessarily parallel) comes out! :smile:

You don't need the coordinates (though of course they often help a lot), any more than you need coordinates to write a vector. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
21K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
50K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K