Use the Virial theorem to show the following...

GravityX
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I have to show the following with the virial theorem ##E=\langle \cal H \rangle_k## ##=k_bT \sum\limits_{i=1}^{N}a_i##
Relevant Equations
none
The expression ##\langle \cal H \rangle_k## is the expected value of the canonical ensemble.

The Hamiltonian is defined as follows, with the scaling ##\lambda##

##\lambda \cal H ## : ##\lambda H(x_1, ...,x_N)=H(\lambda^{a_1}x_1,....,\lambda^{a_N}x_N)##

As a hint, I should differentiate the Hamiltonian with respect to ##\lambda##

Unfortunately, I don't know how exactly I should do this, i.e. form the derivative, I have now proceeded in such a way that I have formed the differential

$$H(\lambda^{a_1}x_1,...\lambda^{a_N}x_N)=\lambda^{a_1}x_1\frac{\partial H}{\partial x_1}+...\lambda^{a_N}x_N\frac{\partial H}{\partial x_N}$$

Then the derivative should look like this,

$$\frac{\partial}{\partial \lambda}H(\lambda^{a_1}x_1,...\lambda^{a_N}x_N)=a_1\lambda^{a_1-1}x_1\frac{\partial H}{\partial x_1}+...a_N\lambda^{a_N-1}x_N\frac{\partial H}{\partial x_N}$$

Is this correct
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not entirely. Just take the total derivative of the equation
$$\lambda H(x_1,\ldots,x_N)=H(\lambda^{a_1} x_1,\ldots,\lambda^{a_N} x_N).$$
Your last equation is correct.

Next you have to think about, what
$$\left \langle x_k \frac{\partial H}{\partial x_k} \right \rangle$$
might be. For that start with the definition of how to take expectation values in the canonical ensemble. It's not too easy, and maybe you are allowed to use the result, which is the "virial theorem".
 
Thank you vanhees71 for your help and sorry I'm only getting back to you now, I had two weeks Christmas break 🎅

I was able to solve the problem now, the expression ##\Bigl\langle x_k\frac{\partial H }{\partial x_k} \Bigr\rangle## we had stated in the lecture as ##k_bT##.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top