Usefulness of higher math courses for EE/communication

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gauss M.D.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Courses
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relevance of higher mathematics courses, specifically functional analysis and abstract algebra, for Electrical Engineering (EE) and communication theory. Participants argue that while these courses may not be directly applied, they enhance understanding of core concepts in signal processing. The importance of foundational courses like real analysis is emphasized, as well as the potential benefits of self-study in these areas. Additionally, the value of an advanced optimization course is acknowledged as beneficial for practical applications in the field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of signal processing concepts
  • Familiarity with communication theory
  • Basic knowledge of real analysis
  • Experience with proof-based mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the applications of functional analysis in signal processing
  • Explore the role of abstract algebra in communication theory
  • Study advanced optimization techniques relevant to EE
  • Investigate self-study resources for group theory in engineering contexts
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, communication theory researchers, and professionals seeking to deepen their mathematical understanding for practical applications in signal processing and optimization.

Gauss M.D.
Messages
151
Reaction score
1
Not talking about spending all your academic credits on stuff like analytic number theory and etale cohomology or whatever, but there's a couple of math courses I'd be very interested in, if they'd be at all useful to signal processing/communication theory, namely functional analysis and abstract algebra. Of course, taking those would possibly mean foregoing some of the more applied courses (computer vision, algorithms, remote sensing and stuff like that).

Could taking those math courses ever be justified, given the vast amount of interesting applied courses available and the scarcity of available time?

There's also an advanced course in optimization that's available (I really liked the introductory course), but that's probably useful enough not to worry about, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think the mere existence of the endless applied courses means you are going to be using all of them on the job. My impression is that most jobs are not all that broad in their scope. So, I think you could make a good case that something that helps you understand something that you do use more thoroughly would be a better thing to spend your time on than one more random applied thing you won't use, unless there's some very compelling reason why you would need to add it to your skill set.

You shouldn't feel like you have to take a course if you want to learn something, though. Studying functional analysis in your own more applied way might be more useful than taking it from Mr. Abstract in the math department, depending on who's teaching and what book they use and so on. Usually, you'd want to do real analysis first, if you haven't already.

There are apparently some group theory applications in signal processing, but if I were you, my tendency would be to want to learn it as needed on my own, while keeping more of an engineering motivation than to study the subject for its own sake.

Taking at least one proof-based math class to start off with would probably be good, though, because it exposes you to that world and would prepare you to learn more mathematical material on your own. Just opens some doors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Very appreciated input, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K