Using a bearing to replace a spring?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding alternatives to springs for a box design project where a base needs to slide up and down. Participants explore various mechanisms that could allow for controlled movement under load, considering both mechanical and bearing options.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using springs to allow the base to gradually lower under load but expresses concern about the space taken up by long springs.
  • Another participant mentions linear bearings as a potential solution but questions the feasibility of finding a bearing that only moves under a certain force.
  • A third participant proposes the idea of a thrust bearing that would only move after a specific static force is applied, describing the design and function of the platform.
  • One participant argues against the need for expensive linear or thrust bearings, stating that bearings are meant to reduce friction rather than control movement based on force.
  • Suggestions for alternatives include a cable-operated counterweight system, gas springs, and even rubber bands, all of which may also take up significant space.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of using mainsprings or tool balancers as compact alternatives, though these may involve more complexity in design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the necessity and effectiveness of various bearing types and spring alternatives. There is no consensus on a single solution, and multiple competing views remain regarding the best approach to achieve the desired functionality.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the space requirements of various mechanisms and the complexity of some proposed solutions. The discussion highlights the need for clarity on the device's purpose to provide better advice.

mr31lly
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am working on a project that uses a box design with a base. The base has two through holes on the the outer edges that will be used to slide up and down with in the box. The box will support two guide rods where the base can slide up and down.

My intention was to use springs so that as the box is loaded the base gradually lowers. The travel is about 16'' which is a rather long spring and also takes up considerable space when compressed. Does anyone know some sort of alternative to the spring?

My initial thought was some sort of bearing in the base that would only slide when a certain amount of force is applied. So far I am unable to find such a bearing. Let me know of any thoughts or ideas?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
mr31lly said:
I am working on a project that uses a box design with a base. The base has two through holes on the the outer edges that will be used to slide up and down with in the box. The box will support two guide rods where the base can slide up and down.

My intention was to use springs so that as the box is loaded the base gradually lowers. The travel is about 16'' which is a rather long spring and also takes up considerable space when compressed. Does anyone know some sort of alternative to the spring?

My initial thought was some sort of bearing in the base that would only slide when a certain amount of force is applied. So far I am unable to find such a bearing. Let me know of any thoughts or ideas?

It is hard to picture what you have in mind. Linear bearings are very nice for allowing horizontal travel.
http://www.thomsonlinear.com/website/com/eng/products/linear_bearings_and_guides.php

... not sure if you can find something with an internal spring...
 
I am looking for linear bearing, I think a thrust bearing, that would only move after a certain amount of static force is applied to it. That way as the box is loaded the operator just has to push on the top most part and the platform will lower as long as the operate is pushing, until the platform bottoms out. Below is an early design the black part is the platform that will slide up and down, the springs can be seen on the outer edge. However when the springs are compressed they will take up a significant amount of space. Also in the middle of the springs is a guide rod that will support the spring and work with the platform to move only up and down.
upload_2015-1-26_16-43-57.png
 
You don't need (expensive) linear bearings, and you definitely don't need (also expensive) thrust bearings. Bearings are to reduce friction, not "only slide when a certain amount of force is applied", that is the opposite of what bearings are supposed to do!

What exactly is the purpose of your device? If you can explain it's function well we can provide better advice. Does it need to self reset? A counterweight, pulley & cable is an alternative to springs.
 
Perhaps a cable operated counterweight, such as used with elevators?
 
You can use gas springs, Once the load is reached the edges will slide down in the box. But the space used is also big.
 
Gas springs, compression and tension coil springs, even rubber bands, all are going to use up a big space. Maybe some mainspring (spiral spring like in mechanical watches) can be pretty compact, but it will be more complicated: you will need to connect the mainspring to a cylinder with a some coiled cable and maybe some pulleys also.
It comes to my mind maybe it's possible to use a tool balancer like these:
http://www.grainger.com/category/tool-balancers/fastening-tools-and-accessories/power-tools/ecatalog/N-p0f
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K