Using a Catalyst With Fuel Cells: Benefits and Challenges

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of catalysts in fuel cells, exploring the benefits and challenges associated with their application. Participants examine the relationship between potential difference, reaction kinetics, and power output in the context of fuel cells compared to galvanic cells.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the rationale behind using a catalyst in fuel cells, suggesting that increased reaction progress would lead to equilibrium and thus a reduction in power output.
  • Another participant challenges the understanding of how fuel cells operate, implying that the relationship between potential difference and current is more complex than initially presented.
  • A participant proposes that there are conflicting interests in fuel cell operation: maintaining a high potential difference while also achieving a fast reaction rate to maximize current, which in turn maximizes power output.
  • There is a recognition that the comparison to galvanic cells may be misleading, as the operational goals differ significantly between the two types of cells.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of catalysts in fuel cells and the implications for power output, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion arising from textbook descriptions that equate fuel cells with galvanic cells, highlighting the need for clarity regarding the operational differences and the role of catalysts.

Big-Daddy
Messages
333
Reaction score
1
With galvanic cells, we assume that the redox reaction is kinetically inhibited so that equilibrium takes a long time to reach, so we can make a good measurement of the potential difference V. I thought fuel cells were the same originally, except that we recycle in reactants and products to make sure that there's enough of each to maintain a high potential V, so that we produce power (equal to IV where I is the current).

But now I came across the idea of using a catalyst with the fuel cell. That just doesn't make sense to me. The more the reaction occurs, the closer the system will get to equilibrium where V=0 and thus the power output is 0, so why would we want that? OK, so we are cycling in new reactants anyway, so the reaction will never be at equilibrium - but still, why would we want to catalyse it? What's the benefit in that, when the power output is based specifically on potential difference (which is a function of how much of the reaction is still left to go at any given moment in time)?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Big-Daddy said:
the power output is based specifically on potential difference

No.

Apparently you still don't understand how the cell works and (hint) why do we have to close the circuit.
 
Borek said:
No.

Apparently you still don't understand how the cell works and (hint) why do we have to close the circuit.

Ok, so is it because we have two conflicting interests - keeping a large potential difference V for which we need the reaction nowhere near to equilibrium, and getting the reaction to go reasonably fast so that we can get a decent current, I, out of it - and we maximize power (P=VI) by trying to make the reaction go fast (maximize I) and pumping in new reactants constantly (maximize V)? Or am I still not understanding?

The confusion was caused because my book said this was "just like the galvanic cell" except that reactants are pumped in continuously. I think this was slightly misleading because there is a crucial difference - in galvanic cells, we don't want current to flow (even though it is inevitable that a little does) because we want to measure V without the redox reaction getting any (significantly) closer to equilibrium.
 
Big-Daddy said:
Ok, so is it because we have two conflicting interests - keeping a large potential difference V for which we need the reaction nowhere near to equilibrium, and getting the reaction to go reasonably fast so that we can get a decent current, I, out of it - and we maximize power (P=VI) by trying to make the reaction go fast (maximize I) and pumping in new reactants constantly (maximize V)?

That's it.
 

Similar threads

Potential across a battery cell change ion concentrations and electron flow
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
What is the true voltage of a voltaic cell?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Fuel Cell Reaction Question - is this right?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Surface area contact with catalyst effect on hydrogen redox
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Do we need salt bridges in Electrolytic cells?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Question about the Li -> Li+ + e- half cell reaction in a LiB battery
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
Fuel Cells Q&A: Explaining Hydrogen, Electrochemical, & Polymer Cells
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Voltaic cell + battery in series
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Questions on Electrolysis and Fuel Cells
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Chemistry How to find the pH of a galvanic cell (MIT OCW problem set)
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K