Using a stone to hunt down an animal with Centripetal Forces

totallyclone
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A bushman wants to hunt down a kangaroo so he uses a vine which is 2.0m long with a rock tied to the end of it. The bushman holds the other hand above his head which is 2.0m above the ground. The kangaroo observes that when the angle with the vine and vertical reaches 60°, the vine breaks. So, what's the minimum distance for the rock not to hit the kangaroo?

θ = 60°
vine length = 2.0m

Y-component initial = 2.0m
Y-component final = 0.0m

Homework Equations


ac = V2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


I drew a diagram of it and put in the data I know so far.
tumblr_mjxzwoGQhc1qe908uo1_500.jpg

I thought of this question for a bit and I feel like this question requires the concept of projectile motion (when the vine breaks and the rock flies to the kangaroo) and centripetal forces (because the rock is being spun tied to a vine).

The thing is, if I try to find acceleration here, it would be the perpendicular acceleration but when the vine breaks, wouldn't the acceleration that would be affecting the rock by then is a parallel acceleration because it does not go in a circle anymore?
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
Additional info: the stone is being spun horizontally
 
Despite the detailed diagram, it's not clear what plane the rock is spinning in.
 
Alright so after a few days of thinking about this. I learned that my diagram is wrong because it would be impossible for the angle to angle up. So the 60° angles down making it look like it's spinning in the shape of a cone.

Since this question involves the concept of centripetal forces and projectile motion. This is was I found.

Y-initial=2-2cos60°
=1m
So when the vine breaks off, it starts off 1m above the ground.

Since the rock spins horizontally, it has no acceleration in the vertical component. Force of tension will have X and Y-components.
 
haruspex said:
Despite the detailed diagram, it's not clear what plane the rock is spinning in.

So this is my corrected diagram. The changes made:
60° angles down, rather than up
Initial position of Y-component when it breaks changes to 1m
 

Attachments

  • 1364240173748.jpg
    1364240173748.jpg
    31.6 KB · Views: 496
haruspex said:
Despite the detailed diagram, it's not clear what plane the rock is spinning in.

And this is the fbd of the rock :)
 

Attachments

  • 1364240337614.jpg
    1364240337614.jpg
    27.9 KB · Views: 482

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K