Using a velocity-time graph to calculate accelerations, positions, etc.

  • Thread starter Thread starter ikasok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
Click For Summary
To analyze the velocity-time graph for constant acceleration, the initial step is to plot distance against time squared, as this will help determine if the motion is uniformly accelerated. The slope of the resulting line will relate to acceleration, specifically, half of it. Measurement errors are expected, so it's crucial to assess whether the plotted data approximates a straight line within these errors. A line of best fit should be calculated, along with its slope and error margins, to accurately report the acceleration. Understanding these principles will clarify the approach to the problem and aid in solving the subsequent parts.
ikasok
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




using the diagram found at this link:

http:/www.physics.uoguelph.ca/phyjlh/1020/Asst_1/asst1_q1v.jpg"

a) Plot a graph which shows that the acceleration is constant within the errors of measurement.
b) What is the acceleration of the car?
c) What was the velocity of the car at t = 0?
d) If the acceleration remains constant over the next 5 seconds what will be the velocity of the car at t = 9s?
e) What will be the position of the car at the time given in Part d?


Homework Equations



v=d/t , a = v/t

The Attempt at a Solution



so far I've really only tried part a) and I just can't seem to find the answer or any relevant help. What I have done is I have used the 25 m calibration to derive a 1 m = 0.372 cm scale for the graph. after doing ths I have measure all the distances at every 1 s interval. The measurements I have: 0.91 cm = 0.335 m (t=1 s) ; 2.75 cm = 1.02 m (t=2) ; 4.69 cm = 1.74 m (t=3) ; 6.45 cm = 2.40 m (t=4).

I have found velocities for all of these values: t 1 = 0.335 m/s ; t 2 = 0.510 m/s ; t 3 = 0.580 m/s ; t 4 = 0.600 m/s

First of all, are these values even correct? Because when I plot them I get nothing close to a linear graph. Are my errors of measurement that off? Ultimately, I'm just really confused and need some help starting this problem correctly. I feel that once I have a grasp on how to go about doing part a) correctly everything would fall into place. This question is worth 2% of my final mark so I'm kind of freaking out.

Any help is appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a problem with your link.
 
Sorry about that. Could you maybe just copy and paste into your browser?

www.physics.uoguelph.ca/phyjlh/1020/Asst_1/asst1_q1v.jpg[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's the picture diagram attached
 

Attachments

  • asst1_q1.JPG
    asst1_q1.JPG
    9.8 KB · Views: 507
The link doesn't work because part of it is missing (replaced by ...).

It appears that you have distance and time points and want a graph to find acceleration. If so, you must take a look at your accelerated motion formulas that have distance and time in them. And no velocity. If the initial velocity is zero, you could use d = .5at^2.
The idea is to compare it to y = mx + b and see if you can come up with a way to make your data form a straight line with a slope that is related to the acceleration. Forget the b - not needed - and compare
d = .5at^2 with y = mx
Clearly you need to put d on the y-axis and t^2 on the x-axis. That leaves b corresponding to .5a. So if that graph turns out to be a straight line, you have accelerated motion and the slope is .5a.

Of course the data will not form a perfect straight line because of experimental error. You have to judge if it looks more like a straight line than any other pattern. And the wise experimenter never says "it is a straight line" but rather try to estimate error bars for the measurements and see if it "is a straight line to within experimental error". Finally, do a line of best fit and get its slope - and a "steepest" line that still fits the data to within the error bars. Report your best line slope plus or minus the difference between it and the "steepest" line. Perhaps you have more sophisticated ways to do this with a calculator or computer that finds the line of best fit and its standard deviation.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K