Using corrcted value for Hardy Cross method?

Click For Summary
In the discussion about the Hardy Cross method, the main question revolves around whether to use corrected values for junctions in iterative calculations. Specifically, for a junction dividing two loops, there is uncertainty about using the corrected value or sticking to the initial assumption during the first trial. The example provided highlights a discrepancy between the author's approach and the user's interpretation regarding the use of corrected values. The user believes that applying the corrected value is necessary for accuracy, while the author seems to favor the initial assumption. Clarification on the correct approach to using corrected values in the Hardy Cross method is sought.
foo9008
Messages
676
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


i have several example of hardy cross problem involve 2 loops , for the junction that divide 2 loops , is it necessary to use the corrected value for the junction on second loop for the first trial ? or just use the initial assumption will do ?
http://nptel.ac.in/courses/112104118/lecture-36/hyperlink/examp_36_1.htm
using this example , the BD is the junction that divide 2 loops , should we use the corrected value 0.8 -(-0.46) =1.26 or stick to the original assumption (0.8) just like the author ?

in the second example here , the author use the corrected value (0.01731) for junction BE in the second loop instead of 0.0
vLGiFZU.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


i think in the first example , we should use he corrected value 0.8 -(-0.46) =1.26 instead of 0.8
 
Physics news on Phys.org
which is correct ?
 
which is correct ? with or without correction ?
 
anybody can answer ?>
 
bump
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
4K