Using frequency to calculate resonances

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimisreincarn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 4K views
jimisreincarn
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. If the length of the tube used in our experiment is 4 m, how many resonances would you observe when a tuning fork of frequency 256HZ is used?



2. v=f[tex]\lambda[/tex] ; L = (1/4)(2n+1)[tex]\lambda[/tex]



3. 340m/s = 256Hz[tex]\lambda[/tex] [tex]\lambda[/tex] = 1.328125m
4 = (1/4)(2n+1)(1.328125m)
12.05 = 2n+1
5.5 = n
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We need to know what kind of tube you used in lab (open, one end closed, etc.)
 
one end of the tube is open. The other end has water at the end of it.
 
jimisreincarn said:
one end of the tube is open. The other end has water at the end of it.

Ok and you probably raised the water level while ringing the tuning fork and marked where you heard resonances, right?

So this is a closed end tube. You are correct in using the equation [tex]L = \frac{2n+1}{4}\lambda[/tex]

However, you are not correct in leaving L at 4 because you raised and lowered the water level. What you should do is evaluate the inequality [tex]4 \leq \frac{2n+1}{4}\lambda[/tex]
and solve for n. Of course you are only allowed integer values of n.
 
okay, that makes sense. so if my evaluation of the wavelength is correct, i would substitute it into the inequality and I should get n < 5? so at most there are 5 resonance structures.
 
jimisreincarn said:
okay, that makes sense. so if my evaluation of the wavelength is correct, i would substitute it into the inequality and I should get n < 5? so at most there are 5 resonance structures.

Yep, that is what I get as well.