Using Impulse to Solve For the Final Velocity

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for the final velocity of a bullet using impulse and force as a function of time. The equation provided is F(t) = Fc(1+e(-100t)), with an initial velocity of zero and a mass of 0.02 kg. The key point is that the change in momentum (Δp) is equal to the integral of the force function over time, not the function itself. Participants clarify that the integral of F(t) must be calculated to find the impulse, which is essential for determining the final velocity. The conversation concludes with an understanding that the integral is necessary to solve the problem correctly.
spacestrudel
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
What is the final velocity of a bullet given that its change in time is 0.1 seconds and F(t) = Fc(1+e^(-1the00t). The mass of the bullet is 20g.
Relevant Equations
Mvf - mvo = change in p = the integral of Fdt
Hi there,

Just asking a logistics question since I want to be sure I am approaching this problem correctly.

My professor showed me an example of a bullet being fired from a barrel, given its initial velocity was 0. The change in time was 0.1 seconds. The mass of the bullet is 0.02 kg. The equation he gave is F(t) = Fc(1+e(-100t)), where Fc = 100N.

Since we know that MVf - MV0 = Δp = ∫ Fdt, doesn't this mean I can set the given function equal to MVf, since it is already force as a function of time (also since we know the initial velocity equals zero)? Or am I missing something?

Only asking because I can't tell if it's just a ridiculously easy problem or I'm missing something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
spacestrudel said:
doesn't this mean I can set the given function equal to MVf
You mean the integral of the function, right?
 
  • Like
Likes spacestrudel
haruspex said:
You mean the integral of the function, right?
Does it still have to be the integral of that given function even though it is already in terms of F(t)? Because he said that the change in momentum was just the integral of F. So, since I have F(t) - isn't that technically the integral?
 
spacestrudel said:
Does it still have to be the integral of that given function even though it is already in terms of F(t)? Because he said that the change in momentum was just the integral of F. So, since I have F(t) - isn't that technically the integral?
No, what makes you think that? F(t) is the function, ∫F(t).dt is its integral. If F(t)=2t then its integral is t2+constant.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
haruspex said:
No, what makes you think that? F(t) is the function, ∫F(t).dt is its integral. If F(t)=2t then its integral is t2+constant.
Got’cha! I don’t know, haha I was just taking the stuff he wrote on the board literally. Okay! So take the integral of the function given to then use to find the impulse ! Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K