If one uses the limit definition of a derivative (lim of (f(x)-f(a)) / (x-a)) as x approaches a) on a function and you get a value (ie. it is not undefined) does that mean the derivative of the function at that point exists? In other words, even if the limit definition of the derivative works, do you still need to determine whether the function is continuous, smooth and non-vertical at x=a in order to know that the function is differentiable at x=a?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For example,

The derivative of f(x)=(x^2)(sinx) at x=0 is 0 (using limit definition). Is that all the proof needed to show that the function is differentiable at x=0?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Using Limit Definition of the Derivative?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Using Limit Definition | Date |
---|---|

Finding derivative of x^x using limit definition | Jul 10, 2015 |

Using the precise definition of a limit (epsilon & delta) | Jun 23, 2015 |

Prove by using definition of limit | Oct 23, 2010 |

Solving a limit problem using the definition of convergence | Jul 17, 2009 |

Using limit definition of multivariable derivative | Feb 4, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**