Using nuclear shell model to determine parity and spin

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the parity and spin assignments for stable isotopes of calcium, specifically addressing the isotopes 40Ca, 42Ca, 43Ca, 44Ca, 46Ca, and 48Ca. Most isotopes are classified as even-even, resulting in a spin of 0 and even parity, while the spin and parity of 43Ca require further analysis due to its odd number of neutrons. The conversation highlights the importance of identifying the shell in which the unpaired neutron resides, with the 1f7/2 shell being identified for 43Ca. The calculated spin for this neutron is j = 7/2 and its parity is odd. The discussion concludes with confirmation of the calculations and the suggestion to verify results against existing nuclear data.
Flucky
Messages
93
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Use the shell model to determine the parity and spin assignments for all the stable isotopes of calcium.

Homework Equations


n/a

The Attempt at a Solution


The stable isotopes seem to be 40Ca, 42Ca, 43Ca, 44Ca, 46Ca, and 48Ca

I believe all of those isotopes except 43Ca are even-even which means that they have spin=0 and parity=even, however I'm a bit stuck on how to work out the spin and parity of 43Ca.

There are 23 neutrons, so 20 of those fill up the shells to the magic number (20) and we have 3 left over.

How do I work out the orbital angular momentum l and j-value of those?

With these values I could work out the spin of the unpaired nucleon (which would be the j-value) and its parity (-1)l
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Flucky said:
I believe all of those isotopes except 43Ca are even-even which means that they have spin=0 and parity=even

Yes.

Flucky said:
There are 23 neutrons, so 20 of those fill up the shells to the magic number (20) and we have 3 left over.

How do I work out the orbital angular momentum l and j-value of those?

With these values I could work out the spin of the unpaired nucleon (which would be the j-value) and its parity (-1)l

You're almost there - you clearly know that paired nucleons will couple to 0+ in the lowest energy, since you know what the GS spin and parity is for even-even nuclei. Then, you know that you only have one neutron left over that you need to worry about. Now, to work out the spin and parity, you need to know what shell it will sit in.

I don't know where in learning about the shell model you are. Have you come across this http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e5/Shells.png/220px-Shells.png sort of diagram? Or have you gotten to the Nilsson diagram? http://ie.lbl.gov/toipdf/nilsson.pdf. As 43Ca will be very close to spherical, either will work to answer the question.
 
e.bar.goum said:
I don't know where in learning about the shell model you are. Have you come across this http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e5/Shells.png/220px-Shells.png sort of diagram? Or have you gotten to the Nilsson diagram? http://ie.lbl.gov/toipdf/nilsson.pdf. As 43Ca will be very close to spherical, either will work to answer the question.

I'm pretty sure we'd only be working with the first one, the Nilsson diagram looks more advanced.

Going off the first diagram it looks like our lone neutron would be in the 1f\frac{7}{2} shell where nuclear spin j = \frac{7}{2} and parity = (-1)3 [to the power 3 because it is in the f shell] = -1 = odd?
 
Flucky said:
I'm pretty sure we'd only be working with the first one, the Nilsson diagram looks more advanced.

The Nilsson diagram becomes important if you want to talk about deformed nuclei. If you look at the center line of the Nilsson diagram, you'll see that it's the same as the first diagram.

Flucky said:
Going off the first diagram it looks like our lone neutron would be in the 1f\frac{7}{2} shell where nuclear spin j = \frac{7}{2} and parity = (-1)3 [to the power 3 because it is in the f shell] = -1 = odd?

##\frac{7}{2}^-## -- You've got it! You can always check your answer by looking at the data for nuclei. Here's a good place to look. http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/chartNuc.jsp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
e.bar.goum said:
##\frac{7}{2}^-## -- You've got it! You can always check your answer by looking at the data for nuclei. Here's a good place to look. http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/chartNuc.jsp

Great, thanks for the help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes e.bar.goum
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
957
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K