Using PASCO's FFT Ap for Investigation 16D

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around challenges faced when using a tuning fork with FFT/Spectrum Analyzer apps, particularly regarding the inability to obtain a clear frequency reading. Users suspect that built-in background noise cancellation in laptop microphones may be interfering with the detection of the tuning fork's frequency. There are inquiries about potential solutions to bypass this issue, including recommendations for microphones without noise cancellation and the search for FFT apps featuring a trigger threshold function for more precise event detection. Additionally, there's a concern about the overall resolution of the FFT, as it appears inadequate for calibration purposes. The term "Investigation 16D" refers to a specific PASCO lab activity that requires the use of FFT analysis.
FortranMan
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I was trying to incorporate this lab into the course, but when I try using a tuning fork on the FFT/Spectrum Analyzer app I can't get a well defined frequency reading. I tried doing the same thing on an opensource FFT app and had the same issue. I am thinking most laptop microphones these days have built-in background noise cancellation, which is why the FFT app cannot detect the clean frequency of a tuning fork. Is there anyway to jail break this so the app works properly? What open market microphone would anyone recommend that comes without built in noise cancellation? Also does anyone know of an FFT app that comes with a trigger threshold function? These were useful in my lab if you were looking for a particular event, rather than having to keep the soundwave constant till the update rate can pick it up.
 
Science news on Phys.org
FortranMan said:
but when I try using a tuning fork on the FFT/Spectrum Analyzer app I can't get a well defined frequency reading.
Sorry, what does "Investigation 16D " mean in your thread title?
 
FortranMan said:
I was trying to incorporate this lab into the course, but when I try using a tuning fork on the FFT/Spectrum Analyzer app I can't get a well defined frequency reading. I tried doing the same thing on an opensource FFT app and had the same issue. I am thinking most laptop microphones these days have built-in background noise cancellation, which is why the FFT app cannot detect the clean frequency of a tuning fork.
I wouldn't think background noise cancellation would get rid the sound from a tuning fork but would instead get rid of white noise. Have you checked if the microphone works at all? Does the FFT display show anything if you talk into the microphone?
 

That's why I suspect there is some noise cancellation going on. The FFT jumps around when I speak into the microphone, but if I hold a constant humming tone it quickly dies out. The resolution of the FFT seems pretty bad as well, which was why I was using a tuning fork as a calibration mechanism.
It refers to the specific PASCO lab that calls for students to use an FFT.
 
Okay, so this is something I have been thinking about for a long time, because it's something I am passionate about and something that has personally affected me - and that's the generally negative attitude that people take towards physics. I think it's fair to say that the secondary (Middle+ High) school that I go to is one of the most elite in the country - yet I am yet to see another person with a passion for physics. There are countless who have dedicated their life to Chemistry...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
24K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
31K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K