Using Potentiometer to find balancing emf.

  • Thread starter Thread starter harjyot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emf Potentiometer
Click For Summary
Connecting a high resistance in series with a secondary cell in a potentiometer setup does not affect the null point when balanced, as there is no current flowing through the resistor at that point. The potential drop across the high resistance is negligible because the circuit reaches equilibrium, allowing the reference cell voltage to appear directly on the potentiometer slider. This implies that the effective balancing length remains unchanged even after the resistor is removed. The assumption is that the potentiometer's potential gradient is significantly greater than any drop caused by the high resistance. Thus, the balancing emf can be accurately determined regardless of the series resistor's presence.
harjyot
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
According to my book, if we connect a high resistance in series to the secondary cell (whose emf is to be balanced) , connect this whole apparatus to a potentiometer with an auxiliary Emf and find the null point . It's written that even after removing the Hugh resistance the null point comes down to be the same. How's that ? Doesn't the High resistance In fact contribute to increase the effective balancing length? Or do we assume that the potential gradient of the potentiometer far exceeds the potential drop created by the resistance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would have been nice to have a circuit showing what you mean. My guess is that when in balance there is no voltage drop across the "high resistance". So no current flowing through it which means it can be replaced with a short circuit without anything changing.
 
harjyot said:
According to my book, if we connect a high resistance in series to the secondary cell (whose emf is to be balanced) , connect this whole apparatus to a potentiometer with an auxiliary Emf and find the null point . It's written that even after removing the Hugh resistance the null point comes down to be the same. How's that ? Doesn't the High resistance In fact contribute to increase the effective balancing length? Or do we assume that the potential gradient of the potentiometer far exceeds the potential drop created by the resistance?

When the potentiometer is balanced, there is no current through the series 'protection' resistor so there is no voltage drop across it and the reference cell voltage also appears on the slider of the pot.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K