MHB Using Properties of Real Numbers: Justifying Equalities

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on justifying equalities using properties of real numbers. Participants emphasize the importance of the associative and commutative laws for addition in simplifying expressions. There is a mention of a typo regarding a missing term in one of the equations. Additionally, it is suggested that studying the axioms of real numbers is essential for understanding the justification process. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clarity in applying mathematical properties to validate equalities.
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
justify each of the steps in the following equalities.

i don't know where to start. what i know is i have to use properties of real numbers. please help!

1. $\displaystyle \left ( x+3 \right )\left(x+2\right)\,=\,\left ( x+3 \right )x+\left ( x+3 \right )2\,=\,\left ( x^2+3x \right )+\left ( 2x+3*2 \right ) $

2. $\displaystyle \left(3x^2+2\right)+\left(x^2+2x\right)\,=\,\left(\left (3x^2+2\right)+x^2\right)\,=\,\left(x^2+\left(3x^2+2\right)\right)+2x$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
paulmdrdo said:
2. $\displaystyle \left(3x^2+2\right)+\left(x^2+2x\right)\,=\,\left(\left (3x^2+2\right)+x^2\right)\,=\,\left(x^2+\left(3x^2+2\right)\right)+2x$
Apart from missing the 2x term in the middle expression (a typo I presume) this is just regrouping using the associative and commutative laws for addition.

-Dan
 
I am not sure which properties are meant, but you probably should study the axioms of real numbers (see, e.g., http://www.calvin.edu/~rpruim/courses/m361/F03/overheads/real-axioms-print-pp4.pdf). Then study https://driven2services.com/staging/mh/index.php?threads/5700/. For each equality, you have to say which axiom is used.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K