Using Stokes' Theorem for Hemispherical Surface Area Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter sci-doo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stokes Theorem
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
sci-doo
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate
[tex]\int \int _{S}\nabla \times \overline{F} \cdot \hat{N}dS[/tex]

where [tex]\overline{F} = 3y\hat{i} - 2xz\hat{j} + (x^{2}-y^{2})\hat{k}[/tex] and S is a
hemispherical surface x2 + y2 + z2 = a2, z ≥ 0 and [tex]\hat{N}[/tex] is a normal of the surface outwards. Can you use Stokes' theorem?

Homework Equations


I think I can use Stokes' theorem

[tex]\int \int _{S}\nabla \times \overline{F} \cdot \hat{N}dS = \oint_{C} \overline{F} \cdot d\overline{r}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\oint_{C} \overline{F} \cdot d\overline{r} = \oint_{C} 3y\hat{i} - 2xz\hat{j} + (x^{2}-y^{2})\hat{k} \cdot (dx\hat{i} + dy\hat{j} + dz\hat{k})[/tex]
[tex]= \oint_{C} (3y dx - 2xz dy + (x^{2}-y^{2})dz)[/tex]

I don't know how to continue!

I should probably integrate closed line C that is the perimeter curve of the surface (circle radius a), but I have no further idea how to do that. I'm new to this subject and I simply don't understand what I could do/write .. :cry:

Help is highly appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Odd, most people learn how to integrate on curves before getting to Stokes' theorem.

The circle of radius a, in the xy-plane can be written in terms of the parameter [itex]\theta[/itex] as
[itex]x= a cos(\theta)[/itex]
[itex]y= a sin(\theta)[/itex]
z= 0.

[tex]dx= -a sin(\theta)d\theta[/tex]
[tex]dy= a cos(\theta)d\theta[/tex]
dz= 0
 
HallsofIvy said:
Odd, most people learn how to integrate on curves before getting to Stokes' theorem.
:smile:
HallsofIvy said:
The circle of radius a, in the xy-plane can be written in terms of the parameter [itex]\theta[/itex] as
[itex]x= a cos(\theta)[/itex]
[itex]y= a sin(\theta)[/itex]
z= 0.

[tex]dx= -a sin(\theta)d\theta[/tex]
[tex]dy= a cos(\theta)d\theta[/tex]
dz= 0

Ok, I got a solution -3a2pi

What I did I made
[tex]\overline{r}(t) = a cos t + a sin t[/tex] where [tex]0 \leq t \leq 2 \pi[/tex]

and then dot product of F(r) and r'(t)

I integrated that from 0 to 2pi with respect to t.

Can I somehow expect a negative result?