Evaluating ∫cF⋅dr Using Stokes' Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter happykamper21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stokes Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of Stokes' Theorem to evaluate the line integral ∫cF ⋅ dr, where F(x, y, z) = x²zi + xy²j + z²k and C is defined by the intersection of the plane x + y + z = 1 and the cylinder x² + y² = 9. The key takeaway is that both sides of Stokes' Theorem can be utilized interchangeably, although one may be more advantageous depending on the problem context. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding when to apply the curl of F and the surface integral, as well as the necessity of using the theorem to compute the circulation integral effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically Stokes' Theorem
  • Familiarity with curl and surface integrals
  • Knowledge of line integrals and their applications
  • Ability to work with three-dimensional geometric shapes, such as planes and cylinders
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Stokes' Theorem in various contexts
  • Learn how to compute the curl of a vector field in three dimensions
  • Practice evaluating surface integrals and line integrals with different vector fields
  • Explore example problems that illustrate the use of both sides of Stokes' Theorem
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in advanced calculus, particularly those studying vector calculus and its applications in physics and engineering.

happykamper21
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use Stokes' Theorem to evaluate ∫cF ⋅ dr, where F(x, y, z) = x2zi + xy2j + z2k and C is the curve of the intersection of the plane x + y + z = 1 and the cylinder x2 + y2 = 9 oriented counterclockwise as viewed from above.

Homework Equations


Stoke's Theorem:
cF ⋅ dr = ∫s curlF ⋅ ds

The Attempt at a Solution


For this problem I am extremely confused of which variant of Stoke's theorem to use and when it is appropriate to use a certain variant. For this problem my teacher found the curlF and then dotted it with the ds. However there are problems in the same section where he uses the left side of Stoke's Theorem. Is it possible to use both? If so, would it be possible to say which would be more advantageous over the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since both sides give identical answers, it is concievable to use either one or both. But often one is much easier than the other. You can probably get a feel for which is easier by looking at the examples and the one that your teacher did not use to see what the problems would be. In example problems, you are often given the information needed for one side and not for the other, so it is simple.
 
Since you are being told to use the theorem to compute the circulation integral, you should use it to go from a circulation integral to a surface integral. If you just computed the circulation integral you would not be using the theorem...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K