Evaluating the Curl Using Stokes' Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sai-
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on evaluating the integral \(\int\int \nabla \times \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{S}\) using Stokes' Theorem, specifically for the vector field \(\vec{F}(x,y,z) = \langle e^{z^{2}}, 4z - y, 8x \sin(y) \rangle\) over the surface defined by the paraboloid \(z = 4 - x^{2} - y^{2}\) above the xy-plane. The solution confirms that the integral evaluates to zero, indicating that the circulation of the vector field around the boundary of the surface is null. The discussion also includes LaTeX formatting tips for better presentation of mathematical expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stokes' Theorem
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically curl and surface integrals
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical typesetting
  • Knowledge of parametrization of curves and surfaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Stokes' Theorem in different vector fields
  • Learn about the implications of zero circulation in vector fields
  • Explore advanced topics in vector calculus, such as Green's Theorem
  • Practice LaTeX formatting for mathematical expressions and integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying vector calculus and Stokes' Theorem, as well as anyone looking to improve their LaTeX skills for presenting mathematical content.

Sai-
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use Stokes' Theorem to evaluate \int\int curl \vec{F}\bullet d\vec{S} where \vec{F}(x,y,z) = <e^{z^{2}},4z-y,8xsin(y)> and S is the portion of the paraboloid
z = 4-x^{2}-y^{2} above the xy plane.


Homework Equations


Stokes Thm:\int\int curl \vec{F}\bullet d\vec{S} = \int \vec{F}\bullet d\vec{r}

\vec{F}(x,y,z) = <e^{z^{2}},4z-y,8xsin(y)>

S: z = 4-x^{2}-y^{2} above the z = 0.

The Attempt at a Solution


C: \vec{r}(t) = <2cos(t), 2sin(t), 0> where 0\leq t\leq2\pi
\vec{r}'(t) = <-2sin(t), 2cos(t), 0>

\vec{F}(\vec{r}(t)) = <e^{0}, (4(0) - 2sin(t), 8(2(cos(t))sin(2cos(t))>
\vec{F}(\vec{r}(t)) = <1, -2sin(t), 16cos(t)sin(2cos(t))>

\int <1, -2sin(t), 16cos(t)sin(2cos(t))> \bullet <-2sin(t), 2cos(t), 0> dt from 0 to 2pi
=\int -2sin(t)-2sin(t)2cos(t) dt from 0 to 2pi
=0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sai- said:

Homework Statement


Use Stokes' Theorem to evaluate \int\int \nabla \times \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{S} where \vec{F}(x,y,z) = <e^{z^{2}},4z-y,8x\sin(y)> and S is the portion of the paraboloid
z = 4-x^{2}-y^{2} above the xy plane.

Homework Equations


Stokes Thm:\int\int \nabla \times \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{S} = \int \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}

\vec{F}(x,y,z) = <e^{z^{2}},4z-y,8x\sin(y)>

S: z = 4-x^{2}-y^{2} above the z = 0.

The Attempt at a Solution


C: \vec{r}(t) = <2\cos(t), 2\sin(t), 0> where 0\leq t\leq2\pi
\vec{r}'(t) = <-2\sin(t), 2\cos(t), 0>

\vec{F}(\vec{r}(t)) = <e^{0}, (4(0) - 2\sin(t), 8(2(\cos(t))\sin(2\cos(t))>
\vec{F}(\vec{r}(t)) = <1, -2\sin(t), 16\cos(t)\sin(2\cos(t))>

\int <1, -2\sin(t), 16\cos(t)\sin(2\cos(t))> \cdot <-2\sin(t), 2\cos(t), 0> dt from 0 to 2pi
=\int_0^{2\pi} -2\sin(t)-2\sin(t)2\cos(t) dt [STRIKE]from 0 to 2pi[/STRIKE]
=0

Some latex pointers. If you will put a backslash in front of any function in tex it prints in a much nicer font. Also you can use \cdot instead of \bullet and \nabla\times for curl. I have done that in my quote so you can see the difference. Also you can put the limits on the integral as I illustrate in one line above.

A problem like this should give some orientation for the surface, although with an answer of zero it doesn't matter much. Your work looks correct unless I have overlooked something.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
LCKurtz said:
Some latex pointers. If you will put a backslash in front of any function in tex it prints in a much nicer font. Also you can use \cdot instead of \bullet and \nabla\times for curl. I have done that in my quote so you can see the difference. Also you can put the limits on the integral as I illustrate in one line above.

A problem like this should give some orientation for the surface, although with an answer of zero it doesn't matter much. Your work looks correct unless I have overlooked something.

Thank you, I will remember those hints and tips for next time!

And thanks for looking at my work, I think it is correct too; I just can't afford to miss any points on any problem, its dead week and I need all the points I can get.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K