Using Stokes' Theorem for Hemispherical Surface Area Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter sci-doo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stokes Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on using Stokes' Theorem to calculate the surface integral of the vector field \(\overline{F} = 3y\hat{i} - 2xz\hat{j} + (x^{2}-y^{2})\hat{k}\) over a hemispherical surface defined by \(x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = a^2\) for \(z \geq 0\). The user successfully derived the line integral around the circular boundary \(C\) in the xy-plane, parameterized by \(\theta\), resulting in a final answer of \(-3a^2\pi\). The discussion highlights the application of Stokes' Theorem in transitioning from a surface integral to a line integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically Stokes' Theorem
  • Familiarity with vector fields and line integrals
  • Knowledge of parameterization of curves in the xy-plane
  • Basic integration techniques in multivariable calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Stokes' Theorem in various contexts
  • Learn about vector field parameterization and its implications in line integrals
  • Explore examples of surface integrals and their conversion to line integrals
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of negative results in vector calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector calculus, particularly those interested in applying Stokes' Theorem to solve surface and line integrals.

sci-doo
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate
\int \int _{S}\nabla \times \overline{F} \cdot \hat{N}dS

where \overline{F} = 3y\hat{i} - 2xz\hat{j} + (x^{2}-y^{2})\hat{k} and S is a
hemispherical surface x2 + y2 + z2 = a2, z ≥ 0 and \hat{N} is a normal of the surface outwards. Can you use Stokes' theorem?

Homework Equations


I think I can use Stokes' theorem

\int \int _{S}\nabla \times \overline{F} \cdot \hat{N}dS = \oint_{C} \overline{F} \cdot d\overline{r}

The Attempt at a Solution



\oint_{C} \overline{F} \cdot d\overline{r} = \oint_{C} 3y\hat{i} - 2xz\hat{j} + (x^{2}-y^{2})\hat{k} \cdot (dx\hat{i} + dy\hat{j} + dz\hat{k})
= \oint_{C} (3y dx - 2xz dy + (x^{2}-y^{2})dz)

I don't know how to continue!

I should probably integrate closed line C that is the perimeter curve of the surface (circle radius a), but I have no further idea how to do that. I'm new to this subject and I simply don't understand what I could do/write .. :cry:

Help is highly appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Odd, most people learn how to integrate on curves before getting to Stokes' theorem.

The circle of radius a, in the xy-plane can be written in terms of the parameter \theta as
x= a cos(\theta)
y= a sin(\theta)
z= 0.

dx= -a sin(\theta)d\theta
dy= a cos(\theta)d\theta
dz= 0
 
HallsofIvy said:
Odd, most people learn how to integrate on curves before getting to Stokes' theorem.
:smile:
HallsofIvy said:
The circle of radius a, in the xy-plane can be written in terms of the parameter \theta as
x= a cos(\theta)
y= a sin(\theta)
z= 0.

dx= -a sin(\theta)d\theta
dy= a cos(\theta)d\theta
dz= 0

Ok, I got a solution -3a2pi

What I did I made
\overline{r}(t) = a cos t + a sin t where 0 \leq t \leq 2 \pi

and then dot product of F(r) and r'(t)

I integrated that from 0 to 2pi with respect to t.

Can I somehow expect a negative result?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K