Using Symmetry to Evaluate Double Integrals over a Square Region

  • Thread starter Thread starter ktobrien
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the integral SS_D 6 - x + 7y dA over a square region D with vertices at (±5, 0) and (0, ±5). The initial calculation yielded an answer of 300, which was confirmed to be correct by evaluating the integral over half the square and doubling the result. Participants clarified that the region D is a 5x5 square, not a 10x10 square, and discussed how symmetry can simplify the evaluation, noting that integrals involving odd functions like -x and 7y vanish over symmetric regions. Ultimately, the correct answer for the integral is affirmed as 300, demonstrating the utility of symmetry in solving double integrals. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately defining the region of integration and recognizing the properties of symmetric functions.
ktobrien
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use symmetry to evaluate the given integral.
SS_D 6-x+7y dA
where D is the region bounded by the square with vertices (±5, 0) and (0, ±5).

Homework Equations


Integrals

The Attempt at a Solution


I worked it out and got 300. But I did it by integrating one half then the other and adding the two together. I am looking for someone to confirm rather my answer is correct of not and to show me how to do it using symmetry
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It think it's 600 isn't it? Hint: can you show that SS_D 6 is the same as your original integral using symmetry?
 
Yes. SS_D 6 is also 300. Does this mean my answer is right?
 
So your answer to Dick's question, "can you show that SS_D 6 is the same as your original integral using symmetry?" is yes? How do you show it?
 
ktobrien said:
Yes. SS_D 6 is also 300. Does this mean my answer is right?

No, SS_D 6 isn't 300. How are you getting that? D is a 10x10 square. My hint was to show SS_D (-x) and SS_D 7y are zero. And then think about why.
 
SS_D 6 is 300 over the square. x goes from 0 to 5 and y goes from x-5 to 5-x. This is half of the square. This integral equals 150. You then multiply that by 2 to get the whole square. The answer is therefore 300. My answer is correct. Also, D is not a 10X10 square. It is a 5X5 square with its corners at (5,0), (0,5), (-5,0), and (0,-5).
 
ktobrien said:
SS_D 6 is 300 over the square. x goes from 0 to 5 and y goes from x-5 to 5-x. This is half of the square. This integral equals 150. You then multiply that by 2 to get the whole square. The answer is therefore 300. My answer is correct. Also, D is not a 10X10 square. It is a 5X5 square with its corners at (5,0), (0,5), (-5,0), and (0,-5).

Ah, you are right. I was drawing the wrong square. Sorry. The sides of the square actually have length 5*sqrt(2). But now can you see why the integral of (-x) or 7*y over the square will automatically vanish?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
17K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K