Using Tensor Notations and Levi Civita Symbol to Prove Lagrange's Identity

  • Thread starter Thread starter advphys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving Lagrange's identity using tensor notations and the Levi Civita symbol. Participants explore how to represent the dot product on the left side of the identity using the Levi Civita symbol and the provided identity involving Kronecker deltas. One user outlines the components of the cross products and their dot product, suggesting that the resulting expression will yield six terms. However, there is confusion regarding the number of terms expected on the right side of the identity, indicating a need for clarification. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding tensor notation and the Levi Civita symbol in vector calculus.
advphys
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

Any idea for the proof of the Lagrange's identity using tensor notations and Levi Civita symbol?

(a x b).(c x d)=(a.c)(b.d) - (a.d)(b.c)

x: cross product
a,b,c,d: vectors

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, thanks, in future i will be more careful.

What about the dot product on the left side, how can i use Levi Civita symbol to represent it.
Actually, the identity that you wrote and the cross product representation are all i know about the Levi Civita symbol but i couldn't use them.
 
Use the following identity:

εijkεimn = δjmδkn - δjnδkm

Also, in future, post questions like this in the homework section of PF, and tell us a little about how you've tried to solve the problem.
 
advphys said:
Ok, thanks, in future i will be more careful.

What about the dot product on the left side, how can i use Levi Civita symbol to represent it.
Actually, the identity that you wrote and the cross product representation are all i know about the Levi Civita symbol but i couldn't use them.
The i component of a x b is ajbkεijk and the i component of c x d is cmdnεimn

So their dot product is ajbkcmdnεijkεimn
 
ok from there,
ajcjbkdk-ajdjbkck
and i assume, similar form can be obtained for j and k components by just replacingg j s with k s, i s with j s and k s with i s. And in total i have 6 terms, 2 terms from each component. Am i right?

But, on the right had side i think i should have more than 6 terms?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K