Using the slope of the graph, write an equation for this proportion

  • Thread starter Thread starter F.B
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Slope
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving a proportionality statement relating resistance (R), diameter (d), and length of an electrical conductor based on experimental data. The relationship is established through the inverse square of diameter, represented as R = k/d^2, where k is a constant derived from the slope of the graph plotting resistance against 1/d^2. The user is advised to isolate variables by plotting resistance against length for fixed diameters and vice versa to clarify relationships before combining them into a comprehensive equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrical resistance and Ohm's Law
  • Familiarity with proportionality and inverse relationships
  • Basic graphing skills for plotting data
  • Knowledge of linear equations and slope calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to plot resistance vs. diameter for constant lengths
  • Study the concept of inverse proportionality in physics
  • Explore three-dimensional graphing techniques for multiple variables
  • Investigate the relationship between resistance, length, and diameter in electrical conductors
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, particularly those studying electrical properties of materials, and anyone conducting experiments involving resistance in conductors.

F.B
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Im in gr.12 and my teacher gave us a dry lab to do. I have all the information. But there's a question that i can't answer. So can you please help me.

The purpose of this lab is to determine the relationship between the resistance, the length and the diameter of an electrical conductor.


This is the data. This table won't come out very good so please try your best to understand it. The data ends up crunched up together for some reason

Diameter (cm) Resistance 1/d^2
0.025 15.7 1600
0.04 6.1 625
0.075 1.9 177.7
0.125 0.6 64


The 1/d^2 is when the inverse motion becomes a straight line because we are doing proportionality statements.

Anyways this is the question i need help on.

When a straight line is achieved which is 1/d^2, write a proportionality statement relating R and d, for a constant length. Using the slope of the graph, write an equation for this proportion.

Can anyone help me with this question?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If there's an indirect proportionality between, say, x and y^2, that means the relation can be written as

x = k/y^2

where k is a constant. That constant will be the slope of the line you get when you graph x against 1/y^2.
 
I can't use x=something. That would be sort of wrong i would have to use y=something because y is the resistance. So it would have to be y=kx^-2 or y=k/1/x^2.
 
I need help once again. I need to post all the data from my lab but its going to get all crunched up again.

sorry is its really hard to read the chart but i don't know how to fix it. Anyways there are 4 different lengths and at each length the resistance gets stronger and stronger. My question is that i have to create a proportionality statement between the length diameter and resistance. So can anyone please help me.

Length 100 140 170 220
Diameter (cm) Resistance
0.025 15.7 22.0 26.8 34.7
0.04 6.1 8.5 10.4 13.3
0.075 1.9 2.5 3.0 3.9
0.125 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.4
 
First off, the 'x' and 'y' are just variables, and you're free to define them as you wish. If you find it easier to think of it as y = k/x^2, feel free. It won't change anything.

As for the other, I'm sorry, but I can't read the data well enough to help you. All I can do is offer some generic advice and hope it works.

The easiest way to handle this would be to isolate your variables. This would mean plotting resistance vs. length for wires of common diameter, then plotting resistance vs. diameter for wires of constant length. In this way, you can see the relationships between diameter and resistance and length and resistance without other factors intruding. Once you know those relationships, you can combine them into a single equation and test it against the totality of your data. The problem is that I don't know if you have the kind of data you can use for this analysis. From your description, it appears that you might, but I just can't tell.

If you don't, you can analyze it all at once, but it becomes harder. You'd need to plot your data on a three-dimensional grid, going for resistance vs. length and diameter. If you get the right powers on the length and diameter, then your results will be a straight line with the slope of that line being the constant of proportionality. The problem is that, while it's relatively easy to mess with the powers for a single variable until you get a straight line, it's geometrically harder as you add in independent variables. One also needs a decent knowledge of geometry to work in three dimensions. Fortunately, all you really need to work with (once you have the right powers) are linear functions, but as the whole point is to find the powers, I'm not sure how much help that will be.

Does that help at all?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K