Utilizing Coefficients of Static and Kinetic Friction in a Pulley System

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Review
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a block and a bucket connected by a cord over a frictionless pulley. The problem includes coefficients of static and kinetic friction, with the goal of determining the mass of sand needed to initiate movement and the resulting acceleration of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of both static and kinetic friction coefficients, questioning when to apply each. Some express confusion over the number of unknowns in their equations and consider whether solving for both coefficients might yield additional insights.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between forces acting on the block and bucket. Some participants have offered calculations related to static friction and its implications for determining the mass of sand, while others are still seeking clarity on the problem setup and the application of friction coefficients.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of having multiple unknowns and the need to differentiate between static and kinetic friction in their calculations. There is also mention of the gradual addition of sand to the bucket, which affects the system's movement.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
A 25.5 kg block is connected to an empty 1.00 kg bucket by a cord running over a frictionless pulley (Fig. 4-57). The coefficient of static friction between the table and the block is 0.400 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between the table and the block is 0.320. Sand is gradually added to the bucket until the system just begins to move.
th_4_57alt.gif


I am having the most trouble finding out how to utilize the coefficient of static AND kinetic friction. Do I need to use both? I have my FBDs all drawn up, but I keep on ending up with 2 equations and 3 unknowns.

Take to right as + and down as +...from the FBD of the Block I get \sum F=m_Ba implies -Fr+T=m_Ba where Fr=\mu*N (but I have yet to decide which mu to use?? I would assume since there is an acceleration, I need to use mu of kinetic friction)

N_B=m_Bg B=Block. b=bucket

From FBD of bucket I get -T+m_bg=m_ba


Find the mass of the sand added to the bucket:

Find the acceleration of the system:

A hint would be dope!
Casey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i have a similar problem like this

i was confused on both givens, since your last sentence states that it gradually moves ... use kinetic friction.
 
Yeah...I keep coming up with too many unknowns...

I get from FBD_B: -m_Bg*\mu_k+T=m_Ba
so T=m_B(a+g\mu) and from FBD_b T=m_b(g-a)

So I have T, a, and the mass added to the bucket that are unknown...

I was thinking of maybe solving for mu_k AND mu_static...That might provide me with a third equation. Since mu_static-mu_k=0.4-0.32
That might work...

EDIT: this is an fing mess...any ideas?
 
Last edited:
I am still jammed on this...do you see what I am missing?
 
First calculate force of static friction (force required to make the block move):
F_{f} = \mu_{s} m g = 0.4(25.5)(9.8) = 99.96 N
Now use this to find the mass of sand:
F_{f} = F_{w} = m g ==> m = F_{f}/g = 99.96/9.8 = 10.2 kg
but of course we must subtract the mass of the bucket, so the mass of sand is 10.2kg -1kg = 9.2 kg.
Now to find the acceleration let's first calculate the force of kinetic friction:
F_{f} = \mu_{k} m g = 0.32(25.5)(9.8) = 79.968 N
Thus the net force on the block once in motion is the force due to the weight of the bucket minus the force of kinetic frictions: F = 99.96 - 79.968 = 19.992 N. Using F = ma (or a = F/m) we have a = 19.992/25.5 = 0.784 m/s^2
 
Last edited:
Clearly it has been a while since I have used these terms. So N*mu_s is what is required to move the system? and N*mu_k is what is needed to keep it moving. Ah. I vaguely remember a graph in which static friction increases until it maxes out and then it drops to a constant. Thia makes much more sense now.

Thanks,
Casey
 
yep, you've got it now :)
 
ah i have learned something tonight, thanks too!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K