V to get C. Calculating Max Capacitance of Coaxial Capacitor

  • Thread starter Thread starter seang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Coaxial
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The maximum capacitance of a coaxial capacitor with an inner radius of 5mm, length of 3cm, voltage rating of 2kV, dielectric constant of 2.3, and breakdown electric field of 15MV/m is calculated using the formula C = (2πε_r h) / ln(b/a). The user initially derived incorrect results due to substituting the permittivity of free space with the relative permittivity instead of the product of both. The correct approach involves using Gauss's law to determine the enclosed charge at the breakdown field strength.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coaxial capacitor geometry
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts and Gauss's law
  • Knowledge of dielectric materials and their properties
  • Proficiency in using logarithmic functions in physics equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of capacitance formulas for coaxial capacitors
  • Learn about the implications of dielectric breakdown in capacitors
  • Explore the application of Gauss's law in electrostatics
  • Investigate the effects of varying dielectric constants on capacitance
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, physicists, and professionals involved in capacitor design and analysis, particularly those focusing on coaxial capacitor applications and dielectric materials.

seang
Messages
184
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a coaxial capacitor. If the inner radius is 5mm, the length is 3 cm, and the voltage rating of the capacitor is 2kV, what is the maximum capacitance if the dielectric between the two conductors is 2.3, and E breakdown is 15MV/m.

Homework Equations


<br /> E_r = \frac{\rho_s a}{\epsilon_r r}<br />
a is the inner radius and r is the radius between the inner and outer conductors at whch we want to find the E field. Since the E field will strongest nearest to the inner conductor, I'm using:
<br /> E_{r,breakdown} = \frac{\rho_s}{\epsilon_r}<br />
This is because I want to find the surface charge density nearest to the inner conductor that will !begin to breakdown the dielectric. I figure we never even want to start to breakdown the dielectric. I hope this makes sense.
<br /> V = \frac{\rho_s a}{\epsilon_r}[ln(a)-ln(b)]<br />
with V = 2k I used this to find b (outer radius)
Finally,
<br /> C = \frac{2\pi\epsilon_r h}{ln(b/a)}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I derived all the above equations, and pretty much plugged in numbers, and I'm getting about 1.6 farads which seem wrong.

Actually, thinking about it. I don't see why I can't just use gauss' law to find the enclosed charge (with E = E breakdown) and then divide by 2k
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I got it. If anyone is interested, the mistake I made was deriving the equations by simply replacing the permittivity of free space with the relative permittivity. In fact you are supposed to replace the permittivity of free space with the permittivity of free space times the relative permittivity.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K