Vacuum vs. Compression: Which Requires More Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter violin_writer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compression Vacuum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the energy requirements for compressing air versus creating a vacuum. It is established that pulling a vacuum is generally more challenging due to the propensity for leaks in vacuum systems. The energy needed to compress air increases significantly with pressure, while achieving a perfect vacuum would theoretically require infinite energy. Specific calculations using a syringe demonstrate that compressing air requires more work than creating a vacuum, with values of 3.7 inch-pounds for compression compared to 1.8 inch-pounds for vacuum pulling.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics principles related to gas behavior
  • Familiarity with pressure measurement units such as psi and mbar
  • Knowledge of basic mechanics involving pistons and cylinders
  • Experience with vacuum systems and compressors
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of gas laws and their application in vacuum and compression systems
  • Learn about the design and efficiency of industrial vacuum pumps
  • Investigate the energy consumption metrics of different types of compressors
  • Explore the impact of leaks in vacuum systems on overall energy efficiency
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and technicians involved in pneumatic systems, vacuum technology, and energy efficiency optimization will benefit from this discussion.

violin_writer
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I wander...
which would require more energy, to decompress air like a vacuum or compress air?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
How would you be able to decompress air to an absolute vacuum? And compress air up to what pressure?
 
"decompress air like a vacuum"

is a meaningless statement.
 
Yes, you'll need to be much more specific about what you are talking about. Do you have a specific scenario in mind?
 
Im assuming its a similar thing to pumping losses in an engine.]

i.e is it harder to compress air trapped in a cylinder, or to pull against a vacuum.
 
That's the way I read it. In reality, it is tougher to pull a vacuum because those systems are much more prone to leaking.
 
FredGarvin said:
That's the way I read it...
See, the problem here is that I read the same thing that Chris said and reach exactly the opposite conclusion! We need more info about what the OP is getting at. Anyway...
In reality, it is tougher to pull a vacuum because those systems are much more prone to leaking.
I wasn't thinking the OP really meant energy because in either case, energy could be infinite depending on what you are asking. Ie, since you can't generate a perfect vacuum, you would expend an infinite amount of energy in the attempt. At the same time, compressing air requires more and more energy as well and the OP didn't specify parameters. Here's what I thought of when I read the OP:

Consider a piston/cylinder arrangement, such as a syringe, 1/2" cross sectional area, 4" long. The syringe is half full of air at atmospheric pressure and is closed. How much energy is required to pull or push the piston 1" in either direction? Roughly:

Pulling on the syringe and moving it 1" would yield a minimum internal pressure of 7.4 psi, force of 3.7 lb, and work of 1.8 inch-pounds. In fact, the maximum possible force you could generate with such a syringe in "vacuum pump mode" is 7.4 lb, which limits the amount of work requried to move the piston. Not so in "compressor mode":

Working as a compressor, pushing it 1" yields a pressure of 14.7 psi, a force of 7.4 lb, and requires a work of 3.7 in-lb.
 
hi i know what you mean, whilst i was with edwards vcauum when we used to un the vacuum pump and test the current drawn ,,oncea hard vacuum is reached say.005 mbar vacuum the level of current amps to hold this pressure is qyuite low in compairiosn to an industrial compressor..but its not really relative unless you wre talking absolute compression and absolute vacuum as there are way too many variables
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K