Valid conclusion for an absolutely convergent sequence

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the convergence properties of a series, specifically whether it is absolutely convergent, conditionally convergent, or divergent. The original poster references a problem from Stewart's “Multivariable Calculus” and mentions using the comparison test, while others discuss the validity of this approach.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to validate their use of the comparison test for convergence, while others question the correctness of their inequalities and reasoning. Participants also discuss the implications of convergence and absolute convergence, referencing specific series and tests.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing critical feedback on the original poster's reasoning and suggesting alternative methods, such as the ratio test. There is a focus on clarifying misconceptions about convergence types and the requirements for establishing absolute convergence.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential errors in the original poster's application of the comparison test and the need for upper limits in their arguments. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the definitions and implications of convergence in series.

cherry
Messages
25
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Determine whether the series is absolutely convergent,
conditionally convergent, or divergent. (see description)
Relevant Equations
See description
IMG_E0D186BF6925-1.jpeg


Hello, this is my attempt for #19 for 11.6 of Stewart's “Multivariable Calculus”.
The question is to determine whether the series is absolutely convergent, conditionally convergent, or divergent.
The answer solutions used a ratio test to reach the same conclusion but I used the comparison test.
Is my method also valid? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is not valid. You say that ##\cos( \frac{\pi}{3} n) \ge n/2##. That does not stop it from being huge and the series being divergent. You should be showing that its absolute value is less than something. You should be able to prove a simple upper limit for its absolute value.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cherry and docnet
It seems like you were trying to use a comparison test, but accidentally reversed the inequality sign. Aside from that error, there's another flaw.
Given a series $$S=\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n,$$
$$\lim_{n\to \infty } a_n=0 \text{ doesn't mean } S \text{ converges}.$$
For example,
$$\lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{1}{n}=0 \text{ and } \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n} \text{ is divergent}.$$
Aside from deriving an upper limit of the series, it's also pretty straightforward to use the ratio test.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cherry
Your reasoning is strange. On top of what's already mentioned, you write something like "convergent, therefore absolutely convergent". This is not true.

For sufficiently large indices it holds that
<br /> \left\lvert \frac{\cos f(n)}{n!}\right\rvert \leqslant \frac{1}{n^2}.<br />
What do we conclude?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: docnet
To further explain post #4, since it looks like the OP needs more help:

A convergent series is not necessarily absolutely convergent, and a function that's absolutely convergent is convergent.

With this approach you need the fact that the following sum converges.

$$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^2}$$

See the Basel problem on wiki.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K