Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Validity of virial theorem in QM

  1. Aug 24, 2010 #1
    In the standard derivation of the virial theorem, one assumes to be working in the energy basis. One then gets <T> = n/(n+2) <H>. This relation doesn't hold for the continuous spectrum of Coulomb potential where <T> > 0, <H> > 0, n/(n+2) = -1. So, where in the derivation did we use the fact we were dealing with bound states?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 25, 2010 #2

    DrDu

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    If I remember correctly, the relation is based on evaluation of the term
    [tex] \langle [H,\mathbf{pr}]\rangle=(E-E) \langle \mathbf{pr}\rangle [/tex].
    In the case of bound states, (E-E)=0 and [tex] \langle \mathbf{pr}\rangle [/tex] is finite. In the case of continuum states, the last average diverges, so that one cannot conclude that the whole expression vanishes.
     
  4. Aug 25, 2010 #3
    Oh, I see - Thank you!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Validity of virial theorem in QM
  1. Virial Theorem (Replies: 1)

  2. Virial Theorem (Replies: 1)

Loading...