Validity of virial theorem in QM

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of the virial theorem in quantum mechanics (QM), specifically addressing its derivation under the assumption of bound states. It highlights that the relation = n/(n+2) fails for the continuous spectrum of the Coulomb potential, where > 0 and > 0, leading to n/(n+2) = -1. The divergence of the average momentum in continuum states is identified as a critical point that invalidates the conclusion drawn from the standard derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the virial theorem
  • Knowledge of Coulomb potential in quantum systems
  • Concept of bound versus continuum states in QM
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the virial theorem in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the properties of the Coulomb potential in QM
  • Investigate the differences between bound states and continuum states
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of the virial theorem
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers exploring the foundations of quantum theory and the virial theorem's applications.

Heirot
Messages
145
Reaction score
0
In the standard derivation of the virial theorem, one assumes to be working in the energy basis. One then gets <T> = n/(n+2) <H>. This relation doesn't hold for the continuous spectrum of Coulomb potential where <T> > 0, <H> > 0, n/(n+2) = -1. So, where in the derivation did we use the fact we were dealing with bound states?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I remember correctly, the relation is based on evaluation of the term
[tex]\langle [H,\mathbf{pr}]\rangle=(E-E) \langle \mathbf{pr}\rangle[/tex].
In the case of bound states, (E-E)=0 and [tex]\langle \mathbf{pr}\rangle[/tex] is finite. In the case of continuum states, the last average diverges, so that one cannot conclude that the whole expression vanishes.
 
Oh, I see - Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K