Atomic Van der Waal repulsion and Lennard Jones potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the theoretical derivation of the Lennard-Jones potential, specifically the formula V = ε[(δ/r)^{12} - 2(δ/r)^{6}]. J.E. Lennard-Jones's article "Cohesion" from the Proceedings of the Physical Society is mentioned as a primary source, along with various academic lectures and notes. The contributors clarify that the 1/r^{12} term is a numerical convenience, while the 1/r^{6} term arises from perturbative treatment of dipole-dipole interactions. Additional references include "Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics" by Craig and Thirunamachandran and a comprehensive QM textbook by Cohen-Tannoudji et al. These resources provide detailed insights into the derivation and implications of the Lennard-Jones potential.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Hello there. Do you know any paper that derive the Lennard Jones potential ##V = \epsilon [(\delta / r)^{12}-2(\delta / r)^6]## theorically? If you know a book instead, let me know. Thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Apparently, J E Lennard-Jones discusses some details in an article entitled, Cohesion, in the Proceedings of the Physical Society (1926-1948)
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0959-5309/43/5/301 (must be purchased or accessed through one institution)

Otherwise, one can find notes in various university or academic lectures.
https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshe...Specific_Interactions/Lennard-Jones_Potential

https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshe...cific_Interactions/Dipole-Dipole_Interactions

The Wikipedia article seems consistent with some academic notes I reviewed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lennard-Jones_potential#Physical_background_and_mathematical_details
 
The ##\frac{1}{r^{12}}## portion is not physical--it's just a numerically convenient way to approximate a rapidly increasing function. It's a vestige from a time when computers were much much slower.

The ##\frac{1}{r^6}## portion comes from treating the dipole-dipole interaction perturbatively to second order. This is actually the short-distance limit of the full interaction, not taking into account retardation effects. The full derivation in all its gory details of both short (London) and long (Casimir-Polder) limits is given in "Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics" by Craig and Thirunamachandran (p. 152ff): https://www.google.com/books/editio...rpbdozIZt3sC?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Astronuc, vanhees71, Demystifier and 1 other person
TeethWhitener said:
The ##\frac{1}{r^6}## portion comes from treating the dipole-dipole interaction perturbatively to second order. This is actually the short-distance limit of the full interaction, not taking into account retardation effects. The full derivation in all its gory details of both short (London) and long (Casimir-Polder) limits is given in "Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics" by Craig and Thirunamachandran (p. 152ff): https://www.google.com/books/editio...rpbdozIZt3sC?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover
A derivation can also be found in the 3-volume QM textbook by Cohen-Tannoudji, Diu and Laloe, Chapter XI.C.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and TeethWhitener
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...
Back
Top