Van der Waal repulsion and Lennard Jones potential

  • Context: Atomic 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Repulsion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical derivation of the Lennard-Jones potential, specifically the formula V = ε[(δ/r)^{12} - 2(δ/r)^{6}]. Key references include J E Lennard-Jones's article "Cohesion" in the Proceedings of the Physical Society (1926-1948) and the book "Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics" by Craig and Thirunamachandran, which provides detailed derivations of both short (London) and long (Casimir-Polder) limits. Additional resources include academic lecture notes and a Wikipedia article that summarizes the potential's physical background.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lennard-Jones potential
  • Familiarity with dipole-dipole interactions
  • Knowledge of perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of intermolecular forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics" by Craig and Thirunamachandran for in-depth derivations
  • Explore the Wikipedia article on Lennard-Jones potential for a concise overview
  • Review academic lecture notes on intermolecular forces for practical applications
  • Study perturbation theory to understand its application in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, chemists, and students engaged in theoretical chemistry or molecular physics, particularly those interested in intermolecular forces and potential energy calculations.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Hello there. Do you know any paper that derive the Lennard Jones potential ##V = \epsilon [(\delta / r)^{12}-2(\delta / r)^6]## theorically? If you know a book instead, let me know. Thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Apparently, J E Lennard-Jones discusses some details in an article entitled, Cohesion, in the Proceedings of the Physical Society (1926-1948)
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0959-5309/43/5/301 (must be purchased or accessed through one institution)

Otherwise, one can find notes in various university or academic lectures.
https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshe...Specific_Interactions/Lennard-Jones_Potential

https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshe...cific_Interactions/Dipole-Dipole_Interactions

The Wikipedia article seems consistent with some academic notes I reviewed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lennard-Jones_potential#Physical_background_and_mathematical_details
 
The ##\frac{1}{r^{12}}## portion is not physical--it's just a numerically convenient way to approximate a rapidly increasing function. It's a vestige from a time when computers were much much slower.

The ##\frac{1}{r^6}## portion comes from treating the dipole-dipole interaction perturbatively to second order. This is actually the short-distance limit of the full interaction, not taking into account retardation effects. The full derivation in all its gory details of both short (London) and long (Casimir-Polder) limits is given in "Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics" by Craig and Thirunamachandran (p. 152ff): https://www.google.com/books/editio...rpbdozIZt3sC?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc, vanhees71, Demystifier and 1 other person
TeethWhitener said:
The ##\frac{1}{r^6}## portion comes from treating the dipole-dipole interaction perturbatively to second order. This is actually the short-distance limit of the full interaction, not taking into account retardation effects. The full derivation in all its gory details of both short (London) and long (Casimir-Polder) limits is given in "Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics" by Craig and Thirunamachandran (p. 152ff): https://www.google.com/books/editio...rpbdozIZt3sC?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover
A derivation can also be found in the 3-volume QM textbook by Cohen-Tannoudji, Diu and Laloe, Chapter XI.C.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and TeethWhitener

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K