Van der Waals Equation, Virial Expansion

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 15K views
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Taken from Concepts in thermal Physics:

depeu8.png

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Shouldn't the van der waal's equation be:

[tex]p = \frac{RT}{V_m -b} - \frac{a}{V_m^2}[/tex]
[tex]pV_m = \frac{VRT}{V_m -b} - \frac{a}{V_m}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unscientific said:
Shouldn't the van der waal's equation be:

[tex]p = \frac{RT}{V_m -b} - \frac{a}{V_m^2}[/tex]

Yes. So (26.41) has a wrong sign. But it looks like they got it right in (26.42) and (26.43).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
unscientific said:

Homework Statement



Taken from Concepts in thermal Physics:

depeu8.png



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Shouldn't the van der waal's equation be:

[tex]p = \frac{RT}{V_m -b} - \frac{a}{V_m^2}[/tex]
[tex]pV_m = \frac{VRT}{V_m -b} - \frac{a}{V_m}[/tex]

You're right. It sure looks like they made a slew of algebra mistakes. The first term on the right hand side of 26.41 isn't even dimensionally correct.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Chestermiller said:
You're right. It sure looks like they made a slew of algebra mistakes. The first term on the right hand side of 26.41 isn't even dimensionally correct.

Chet


Right. I didn't notice that they should not have had the factor of V on the left side of equation 26.41.
 

Attachments

  • van.png
    van.png
    1.8 KB · Views: 857