The path integral in quantum mechanics involves a factor ##e^{iS_{N}/\hbar}##, where(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

##S_{N}\equiv \sum\limits_{n=1}^{N+1}[p_{n}(x_{n}-x_{n-1})-\epsilon H(p_{n},x_{n},t_{n})].##

In the limit ##N \rightarrow \infty##, ##S_{N}## becomes the usual action ##S## for a given path.

When the Hamiltonian vanishes, the potential energy of the system offsets the kinetic energy of the system and in the limit ##N \rightarrow \infty## the propagator ##\langle x_{b}, t_{b}|x_{a}, t_{a}\rangle## becomes

##S_{N} \equiv \sum\limits_{n=1}^{N+1}\epsilon\bigg[p_{n}\bigg(\frac{x_{n}-x_{n-1}}{\epsilon}\bigg)\bigg]=\int\ dt\ p\dot{x}##

I would like to think of a physical argument to justify this answer. Thoughts?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Vanishing Hamiltonian for quantum path integral

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Vanishing Hamiltonian quantum | Date |
---|---|

I Hamiltonian in Schrödinger: necessarily total energy? | Feb 22, 2018 |

A Why can the ##1##-point correlation function be made to vanish? | Nov 17, 2016 |

I Square integrable wave functions vanishing at infinity | Oct 16, 2016 |

Do quantum fields vanish at infinity? | Jul 17, 2013 |

Does first order QED matrix elements vanish? | Oct 13, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**