Variation Method: Proving \int \phi^{*} \hat{H} \phi d\tau>E_1

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving an inequality related to the variational method in quantum mechanics, specifically showing that for a normalized function that is not the true ground-state wave function, the integral of the product of the function and the Hamiltonian operator exceeds the ground state energy. The context is rooted in quantum chemistry, particularly in the analysis of energy states.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the condition that the function is not equal to the true ground state and how this affects the sum of coefficients in the variational approach. There is also a focus on ensuring that the final sum is not zero and what that indicates about the coefficients associated with the wave functions.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that the final sum must not be zero to validate the inequality, while others express uncertainty about how to incorporate the condition that the function is not the ground state into their proof. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the coefficients in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is derived from a textbook and that the hint provided suggests a specific approach to transforming the equation into an inequality. The discussion reflects a need for clarity on the assumptions regarding the wave functions and their coefficients.

pedroobv
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is the problem 8.10 from Levine's Quantum Chemistry 5th edition:
Prove that, for a system with nondegenerate ground state, \int \phi^{*} \hat{H} \phi d\tau>E_{1}, if \phi is any normalized, well-behaved function that is not equal to the true ground-state wave function. Hint: Let b be a positive constant such that E_{1}+b<E_{2}. Turn (8.4) into an inequality by replacing all E_{k}'s except E_{1} with E_{1}+b.


Homework Equations



Equation (8.4):
\int \phi^{*} \hat{H} \phi d\tau=\sum_{k}a^{*}_{k}a_{k}E_{k}=\sum_{k}|a_{k}|^{2}E_{k}​

Other relevant equations:

\phi=\sum_{k}a_{k}\psi_{k}​

where

\hat{H}\psi_{k}=E_{k}\psi_{k}​


1=\sum_{k}|a_{k}|^{2}


E_{1}<E_{2}<E_{3}...​

The Attempt at a Solution



\int \phi^{*} \hat{H} \phi d\tau=|a_{1}|^{2}E_{1}+\sum^{\infty}_{k=2}|a_{k}|^{2}E_{k}>|a_{1}|^{2}E_{1}+\sum^{\infty}_{k=2}|a_{k}|^{2}\left(E_{1}+b\right)=|a_{1}|^{2}E_{1}+E_{1}\sum^{\infty}_{k=2}|a_{k}|^{2}+b\sum^{\infty}_{k=2}|a_{k}|^{2}=E_{1}\sum_{k}|a_{k}|^{2}+b\sum^{\infty}_{k=2}|a_{k}|^{2}
\int \phi^{*} \hat{H} \phi d\tau>E_{1}+b\sum^{\infty}_{k=2}|a_{k}|^{2}

I don't know how to apply the condition that \phi\neq \psi_{1} to complete the proof, also I'm not sure if this is the right way to start but that's how I understand the hint given. If you need more information or something is not clear, please tell me so I can do the proper correction.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You just need to show that your final sum is not zero. If it was zero, what would that tell us about each a_k, k\ge 2? And what would that tell us about \phi?

Minor point: your > sign should really be \ge to account for this case.
 
But if the last sum is not zero that mean that there is a mistake somewhere since the purpose is to obtain \int \phi^{*} \hat{H} \phi d\tau>E_{1} right?
 
I think that it is easy to show that the last sum is not zero because if it was zero that would mean that \phi = \psi_{1} according to the equations
1=\sum_{k}|a_{k}|^{2}

\phi = \sum_{k}a_{k}\psi_{k}​

But as the problem statement says, \phi\neq \psi_{1}, so the sum can't be zero. So far, I have not been able to find the mistake (since as I said before the second term must be eliminated to complete the proof). Any help would be appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
13K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K