Variation of cosmological constant with time

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the variation of the cosmological constant with time, particularly in relation to the Weinberg-Salam electroweak model and its implications for cosmology. Participants explore whether this variation is accepted in standard cosmology and its potential effects on cosmological models.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references a paper by Sean Carroll discussing the effective cosmological constant's variation between broken and unbroken symmetry phases, questioning its acceptance in standard cosmology.
  • Another participant requests a journal reference or URL to facilitate discussion about the paper mentioned.
  • A different participant provides a link to a related paper, suggesting that Carroll's views are mainstream or not overly fringe.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the implications of a tiny current cosmological constant and how it interacts with larger contributions, questioning its effects on cosmological models.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mainstream acceptance of a varying cosmological constant, with some suggesting it is not widely discussed or accepted, while others believe it is part of the mainstream discourse.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the implications of a varying cosmological constant and its effects on cosmological models, as well as the lack of extensive discussion in the literature.

kalish
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hello, in the paper from sean carroll "the cosmological constant" we can read this:
In the Weinberg-Salam electroweak model, the phases of broken
and unbroken symmetry are distinguished by a potential energy difference of approximately
MEW ∼ 200 GeV (where 1 GeV = 1.6 × 10−3 erg); the universe is in the broken-symmetry
phase during our current low-temperature epoch, and is believed to have been in the symmet-
ric phase at sufficiently high temperatures in the early universe. The effective cosmological
constant is therefore different in the two epochs; absent some form of prearrangement, we
would naturally expect a contribution to the vacuum energy today of order

Does this variation of the cosmological constant after symetry breaking is considered as real and accepted in standard cosmology? I find very few talks about a varying cosmological constant, and it is about border line theories. Is it set at the value actually observed in the whole evolution of the universe?

Best.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want us to discuss the paper, please give us a journal reference, or preferably a URL on arxiv.org.
 
This is it. I happened to be looking for a variable cosmological 'constant' myself.

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0004075

I think Carrolls views on this are mainstream, or at least not too near the left bank.
 
I think this is also mainstream cause I read it in other papers, but I didn't find a discussion about the cosmological implication. This is kind of weird, If the current cosmological constant is really tiny, then how a tiny constant less a big contribution can not be negative and affect the cosmological models??
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K