Variation with respect to the metric

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gravity90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric Variation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the variation of expressions with respect to the metric tensor in the context of general relativity. Participants explore the implications of different variations and the resulting expressions, focusing on the mathematical treatment of the metric and its derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the outcome of a specific variation leads to ##u_{c}u_{d}## or ##-u_{c} u_{d}##.
  • Another participant provides formulas for the variation of the determinant of the metric and the metric itself, suggesting these can be derived further.
  • Some participants propose using specific delta functions for the variation of the metric, questioning why alternative forms are not used.
  • There is a discussion about the treatment of indices being mute and the implications of varying with respect to different forms of the metric.
  • One participant mentions a specific result from a textbook, indicating a preference for a particular approach to the variation.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to decide which quantities to hold fixed during the variation process, noting that this choice affects the results.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the terminology used, specifically regarding "little g," indicating a lack of clarity in the discussion.
  • There is a query about the physical implications of keeping either the covariant or contravariant form of a vector fixed during the variation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a range of views on the appropriate methods for performing variations with respect to the metric, with no consensus reached on the best approach or the implications of different choices.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific mathematical expressions and results from textbooks, but the discussion remains open-ended with unresolved questions regarding the treatment of indices and the physical significance of different variations.

gravity90
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!

There is something that I would like to ask you. Suppose you have

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}} \frac{\delta (\sqrt{-g} (g^{ab} u_a u_b + 1))}{\delta g^{cd}}[/tex]

The outcome of this would be ##u_{c}u_{d}## or ##-u_{c} u_{d}## ?

I am really confused.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
δ(√-g)/δgμν = ½(√-g) gμν

δgαβ/δgμν = - ½ gαμgβν - ½ gανgβμ

From these you can derive the δ/δgμν's. (Do you really want to do that??)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you very much for your response. But why don't we use:

[itex]\frac{δg^{ab}}{δg^{cd}}[/itex] = {δ^a}_c {δ^b}_d

or

[itex]\frac{δg_{ab}}{δg_{cd}}[/itex] = {δ^c}_a{δ^d}_b ?
 
Last edited:
gravity90 said:
Thank you very much for your response. But why don't we use:
[itex]\frac{δg^{ab}}{δg^{cd}}[/itex] = {δ^a}_c {δ^b}_d
or
[itex]\frac{δg_{ab}}{δg_{cd}}[/itex] = {δ^a}_c {δ^b}_d ?
Sure. (Except they need to be symmetrized.)

What will you use for δ(√-g)/δgcd ?
 
I will use:[itex]\frac{1}{√-g}[/itex] [itex]\frac{δ(√-g)}{δg^{μν}}[/itex] =[itex]- 1/2 g_{μν}[/itex]

This is what I found in the Carroll's textbook and it seems right.

But the thing is that the indices a,b are mute [itex](g^{ab} u_a u_b)[/itex] so upon variation with respect to [itex]δg^{cd}[/itex] or [itex]δg_{cd}[/itex] we should get the same result.
 
Last edited:
gravity90 said:
But the thing is that the indices a,b are mute [itex](g^{ab} u_a u_b)[/itex] so upon variation with respect to [itex]δg^{cd}[/itex] or [itex]δg_{cd}[/itex] we should get the same result.
Well, you have to decide which thing you want to hold fixed - ua or ua. This will be determined by the physics of the problem you're trying to solve.

If you're going to hold ua fixed, write the expression as gab ua ub and use δgab/δgcd.

Otherwise, if you're going to hold ua fixed, write it as gab ua ub and use δgab/δgcd. The two results will differ by a sign.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I respect your math skills... but what the hell are are you guys talking about? Little g? What is little g?
 
Thank you again for your response. But what is the difference between keeping [itex]u^a[/itex] or [itex]u_a[/itex] from a physical point of view?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K