Variational Principle: Find Best Bound State for 1D Harmonic Oscillator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the best bound state for the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using a trial wave function of the form ψ(x) = A/(x² + b²), where A is determined by normalization and b is an adjustable parameter. The variational principle is applied to estimate the ground state energy, Egs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to evaluate integrals necessary for normalizing the wave function and applying the variational principle, expressing concern over the complexity of the integrals involved. Some participants suggest alternative methods for evaluating the integrals, such as trigonometric substitution. Others question the feasibility of generalizing the trial wave function to a form involving a power n.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods for integration and questioning the assumptions made by the original poster. Some guidance has been offered regarding the generalization of the trial wave function, but there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the original poster's solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the variational principle provides a lower bound for the ground state energy, and there is a mention of potential discrepancies in the values of b obtained by different participants.

cepheid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,197
Reaction score
38

Homework Statement



Find the best bound state on Egs for the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using a trial wave function of the form

[tex]\psi(x) = \frac{A}{x^2 + b^2}[/tex]

where A is determined by normalization and b is an adjustable parameter.

Homework Equations



The variational principle

[tex]\langle \psi |H| \psi \rangle \geq E_{gs}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



This problem has some really nasty integrals. E.g., just to normalize the wavefunction, you need to calculate:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{(x^2 + b^2)^2}[/tex]

I was able to find most of them using residue theory. It was a last resort...the only method I could think of! I had to dig through my old complex analysis notes to remind myself of the technique using a semicircular contour of radius r and then letting r go to infinity. The integral of f(z) over the arc is zero, leaving the integral on the real axis, which is the part I want to evaluate. Anyway, I'm actually pretty sure of my answers, which are as follows

The best value of b is:

[tex]b^2 = \frac{\hbar}{m\omega \sqrt{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\langle \psi |H| \psi \rangle = \frac{\hbar \omega}{\sqrt{2}} \geq E_{gs}[/tex]

My question is, in a subsequent problem, Griffiths asks us to generalize this to a trial wavefunction of the form

[tex]\psi(x) = \frac{A}{(x^2 + b^2)^n}[/tex]

Huh? Did I miss something?! I had enough trouble with the integrals the first time around! I don't think contour integration is going to help me. Am I missing some more obvious method for evaluating these integrals?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That first integral is more easily done with the substitution x=tan y, and some trig.
 
hmm...you're right that does work rather nicely. Not too sure about the general case though.
 
cepheid said:

Homework Statement



Find the best bound state on Egs for the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using a trial wave function of the form

[tex]\psi(x) = \frac{A}{x^2 + b^2}[/tex]

where A is determined by normalization and b is an adjustable parameter.


Homework Equations



The variational principle

[tex]\langle \psi |H| \psi \rangle \geq E_{gs}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



This problem has some really nasty integrals. E.g., just to normalize the wavefunction, you need to calculate:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{(x^2 + b^2)^2}[/tex]

I was able to find most of them using residue theory. It was a last resort...the only method I could think of! I had to dig through my old complex analysis notes to remind myself of the technique using a semicircular contour of radius r and then letting r go to infinity. The integral of f(z) over the arc is zero, leaving the integral on the real axis, which is the part I want to evaluate. Anyway, I'm actually pretty sure of my answers, which are as follows

The best value of b is:

[tex]b^2 = \frac{\hbar}{m\omega \sqrt{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\langle \psi |H| \psi \rangle = \frac{\hbar \omega}{\sqrt{2}} \geq E_{gs}[/tex]

My question is, in a subsequent problem, Griffiths asks us to generalize this to a trial wavefunction of the form

[tex]\psi(x) = \frac{A}{(x^2 + b^2)^n}[/tex]

Huh? Did I miss something?! I had enough trouble with the integrals the first time around! I don't think contour integration is going to help me. Am I missing some more obvious method for evaluating these integrals?

note that

[tex]\frac{1}{(x^2+b^2)^3} = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{d}{db^2} ( \frac{1}{(x^2+b^2)^2})[/tex]

You can generalize to an arbitrary n. Therefore, if you know how to integrate with 1/(b^2+x^2), you can integrate any power n. Your result will contain the nth derivative which you can probably find explicitly (it depends, what is the result of the integral with 1/(x^2+b^2) ?)
 
Not to grave dig here too bad, but I don't think the OP came to the right solution and I didn't want someone else to be confused.

The ground state energy of a harmonic oscillator is known to be

[tex]E_{gs}=\frac{1}{2} \hbar \omega ><br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \hbar \omega[/tex]

The variational principle can only find a lower bound on the energy, meaning that the approximation must be greater than or equal to the actual energy of the system.

Working out the problem myself, I got a little different value of b. I believe this is where the OP went wrong.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K