I Variational Principles in Classical Mechanics (Douglas Cline)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the textbook "Variational Principles in Classical Mechanics" by Douglas Cline and its potential as a substitute for the widely regarded "Goldstein." Participants express curiosity about Cline's book, noting its affordability and the desire for alternative perspectives in classical mechanics. Comparisons are made to other texts, including Marion and Thornton, with Goldstein being highlighted as the standard for its depth and advanced content. Overall, there is interest in exploring Cline's work while acknowledging the established reputation of Goldstein. The conversation reflects a broader search for diverse resources in classical mechanics education.
CC4
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Hello,
Has anyone read/heard about the textbook Variational Principles in Classical Mechanics, written by Douglas Cline? Any thoughts on whether I could use it as a replacement for Goldstein?
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CC4 said:
Hello,
Has anyone read/heard about the textbook Variational Principles in Classical Mechanics, written by Douglas Cline? Any thoughts on whether I could use it as a replacement for Goldstein?
Thank you!

It seems like an interesting book, and it's quite cheap. I'm tempted to buy it since I'm always happy to know a new/different classical mechanics book.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top