Variational symmetries for the Emden-Fowler equation

giraffe714
Messages
21
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
The Emden-Fowler equation of astrophysics is ## y'' + \frac{2}{x}y' + y^5 = 0 ## which arises as the Euler-Lagrange equation to the functional ## J(y) = \int_{x_0)^{x_1} \frac{x^2}{2}(y'^2-\frac{1}{3}y^6) dx ##. Find the infinitesimal generators that lead to a variational symmetry for this functional and establish the conservation law $$ x^2(y'y + 2x(y'^2+y^5)) = const. $$
Relevant Equations
$$ \xi \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} + \eta \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} + (\eta' - y'\xi')\frac{\partial f}{\partial y'} + \xi' f = 0 $$ where $$ \eta' = \frac{\partial \eta}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial \eta}{\partial y} y' $$ and $$ \xi' = \frac{\partial \xi}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial \xi}{\partial y} y' $$, Noether's theorem $$ \eta \frac{\partial f}{\partial y'} + \xi (f - \frac{\partial f}{\partial y'}y') = const. $$
So firstly I calculated the partial derivatives of f to be:
$$ \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = \frac{2x}{2} (y'^2 - \frac{1}{3} y^6) + \frac{x^2}{2} (2y'y'' - 2y^5y') = xy'^2 - \frac{1}{3} y^6 + x^2y'(y'' - y^5) $$
$$ \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = \frac{x^2}{2}*\frac{1}{3}*6y^5 = x^2y^5 $$
$$ \frac{\partial f}{\partial y'} = \frac{x^2}{2}*2y' = x^2y' $$

And then I plugged that into the first equation in the "Relevant equations" (not sure what it's called,) with ## \xi_x = \partial \xi / \partial x ## etc. for conciseness:

$$ \xi (xy'^2 - \frac{1}{3}y^6 + x^2y'(y'' - y^5)) - \eta x^2y^5 + (\eta_x + \eta_y y' - \xi_x y' - \xi_y y'^2)x^2 y' + \xi_x (\frac{x^2}{2}(y'^2-\frac{1}{3}y^6) ) + \xi_y (\frac{x^2}{2}(y'^2-\frac{1}{3}y^6)) y' = 0 $$

Which after expanding everything hopefully gives

$$ \xi xy'^2 - \frac{1}{3} \xi y^6 + \xi x^2 y' (y'' - y^5) + \eta x^2 y^5 + \eta_x x^2 y' + \eta_y x^2 y'^2 - \xi_x x^2 y'^2 - \xi_y x^2 y'^3 + \xi_x \frac{x^2}{2} y'^2 - \xi_x \frac{x^2}{6} y^6 + \xi_y \frac{x^2}{2} y'^3 - \eta_y \frac{x^2}{6} y^6 y' = 0 $$

Upon regrouping with ## y'^2, y^6, y', y^5, y'^3, y^6y' ## (and this is probably where my mistake lies, but I don't know how to fix it) gives the equations

$$ \xi x + \eta_y x^2 - \eta_x x^2 + \eta_x \frac{x^2}{2} = 0 $$ (from ## y'^2 ##)
$$ -\frac{1}{3} \xi - \xi_x \frac{x^2}{6} = 0 $$ (from ## y^6 ##)
$$ \xi x^2 (y'' - y^5) + \eta_x x^2 = 0 $$ (from ## y' ##)
$$ \eta x^2 = 0 $$ (from ## y^5 ##)
$$ -\xi_y x^2 + \xi_y \frac{x^2}{2} = 0 $$ (from ## y'^3 ##)
$$ -\xi_y \frac{x^2}{6} = 0 $$ (from ## y^6y' ##)

But, the equation from ## y^5 ## implies that ## \eta = 0 ##, and plugging that into both the equation from ## y'^2 ## and ## y' ## implies ## \xi = 0 ##. This however can't be true since this problem has a conservation law by Noether's theorem in the problem statement. I guess what I'm not fully understanding in this problem is how to group the equations together. Is it just be ## y' ## and their powers? Is it also by ## y ##? What about combination terms like ## y^6y' ##? And if it's the former, what happens to the terms not involving ## y' ##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
giraffe714 said:
Homework Statement: The Emden-Fowler equation of astrophysics is ## y'' + \frac{2}{x}y' + y^5 = 0 ## which arises as the Euler-Lagrange equation to the functional ## J(y) = \int_{x_0)^{x_1} \frac{x^2}{2}(y'^2-\frac{1}{3}y^6) dx ##. Find the infinitesimal generators that lead to a variational symmetry for this functional and establish the conservation law $$ x^2(y'y + 2x(y'^2+y^5)) = const. $$
Please verify that your equation for ##J(y)## that fails to render is:$$J\left(y\right)=\intop_{x_{0}}^{x_{1}}\frac{x^{2}}{2}(y'^{2}-\frac{1}{3}y^{6})dx$$
 
renormalize said:
Please verify that your equation for ##J(y)## that fails to render is:$$J\left(y\right)=\intop_{x_{0}}^{x_{1}}\frac{x^{2}}{2}(y'^{2}-\frac{1}{3}y^{6})dx$$
Oh, yes, that's correct, my apologies.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top