Varying Forms for an Equation of a Line in R^3

  • Thread starter Thread starter kieth89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forms Line
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies two equivalent forms of the equation for a line in three-dimensional space, R^3. The first form, \(\vec r(t)= + t\), defines a line using a point \(M_0 = (x_0,y_0,z_0)\) and a direction vector \(\vec u = (x,y,z)\). The second form, \(\vec r(t)= + t\), defines the line using two points, \(M_0\) and \(M = (x,y,z)\), directed by the vector \(\vec{M_0M}\). Both forms are valid and interchangeable depending on the information provided in a problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation in three-dimensional space
  • Familiarity with parametric equations of lines
  • Knowledge of points and direction vectors in R^3
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector equations in R^3
  • Learn about parametric equations and their applications in geometry
  • Explore the concept of direction vectors and their significance in line equations
  • Investigate the relationship between points and vectors in linear transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying geometry, mathematicians, and anyone interested in understanding vector equations and their applications in three-dimensional space.

kieth89
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I was doing some course work earlier today and noticed that I've seen two different equations for a line in 3D space. Usually the equation I use is:
\vec r(t)=<x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}> + t<x, y, z>
You plug in the various points with what the problem provides. However, a few times I have seen a problem that uses the equation:
\vec r(t)=<x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}> + t<x-x_{0}, y-y_{0}, z-z_{0}>

How do I know which equation to use? Or are these equivalent?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can define a line either with 1 point and a directing vector, or with 2 points.
The first form of is the definition of a line passing through ##M_0 = (x_0,y_0,z_0)## and directed by ##\vec u = (x,y,z)##, while the second form is the definition of a line passing through ##M_0 ## and ##M = (x,y,z) ## (directed by ##\vec{ M_0M}##)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kieth89
Oh, that makes perfect sense. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
998
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
4K