Undergrad Vector and Plane Relationship in 3D

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that the normal vector of a plane is always orthogonal to any vector contained within that plane. This relationship is established through the definition of normality, where the normal vector, denoted as ##\vec{n}##, satisfies the condition ##\langle \vec{n}, P \rangle = 0## for all vectors ##\lambda \vec{p} + \mu \vec{q}## in the plane. The mathematical formulation demonstrates that the normal vector is constrained to be perpendicular to all vectors in the plane, reinforcing fundamental geometric principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector mathematics and operations
  • Familiarity with the concept of normal vectors in geometry
  • Knowledge of linear combinations of vectors
  • Basic grasp of inner product notation and properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of normal vectors in higher-dimensional spaces
  • Study the implications of orthogonality in vector calculus
  • Learn about the applications of planes and vectors in computer graphics
  • Investigate the relationship between linear transformations and normal vectors
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, computer graphics developers, and anyone interested in the geometric properties of vectors and planes in three-dimensional space.

Travis Enigma
Messages
13
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
Vector contained inside the plane.
I have a quick question. If a Vector is contained inside a plane, would the normal of the plane be orthogonal to said vector?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. The normal vector of the plane is perpendicular to all vectors in the plane.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu and Travis Enigma
Okay thank you so much!
 
fresh_42 said:
Yes. The normal vector of the plane is perpendicular to all vectors in the plane.
Does that statement relate to some axiom / definition? Pardon my non-mathematical ignorance but what constrains the normal not to be anywhere in 3D? (I'm thinking Geometry here)
 
Let ##P:=\mathbb{R}\cdot \vec{p} \oplus \mathbb{R}\cdot \vec{q}## be the plane and ##\vec{n}## its normal vector. Then ##\langle \vec{n},P \rangle =0## by definition of normality. This means that ##\langle \vec{n},\lambda \vec{p}+\mu \vec{q} \rangle=0## for all ##\lambda ,\mu \in \mathbb{R}.## This is especially true for the given vector contained in the plane whose coordinates are a specific pair ##(\lambda ,\mu).##

If you define normality by ##\vec{n} \perp \vec{p}\, \wedge \vec{n}\perp \vec{q} \,,## then we get
$$
0=\lambda \cdot 0+\mu\cdot 0=\lambda \langle \vec{n},\vec{p}\rangle +\mu \langle \vec{n},\vec{q}\rangle=\langle \vec{n},\lambda \vec{p}+\mu\vec{q}\rangle
$$
and again ##\vec{n}\perp \lambda \vec{p}+\mu\vec{q}## for a given pair of coordinates ##(\lambda ,\mu).##
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K