Vector Calc: Ortho Projections

  • Thread starter Thread starter winowmak3r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projections Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the projection of vector P in the direction of vector Q and finding the orthogonal component of P relative to Q. The vectors are defined as P = i - 3j + k and Q = -i + 2j + 5k. The correct formula for the projection is ProjQ(P) = {(P·Q)/(Q·Q)}Q, which was correctly applied by the user. However, the orthogonal component calculation, OrthQ(P) = P - ProjQ(P), led to confusion, with the user initially arriving at an incorrect answer due to misapplication of the formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations (e.g., dot product)
  • Familiarity with vector projections and orthogonal components
  • Basic knowledge of linear algebra concepts
  • Ability to manipulate fractions and perform vector arithmetic
NEXT STEPS
  • Review vector projection formulas and their applications in linear algebra
  • Practice calculating orthogonal components of vectors in various contexts
  • Explore common mistakes in vector calculations and how to avoid them
  • Study the implications of vector projections in physics and engineering problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying linear algebra, educators teaching vector mathematics, and anyone seeking to improve their understanding of vector projections and orthogonal components.

winowmak3r
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the projection of P in the direction of Q and the component of P orthogonal to Q.

P=i-3j+k Q=-i+2j+5k

Homework Equations


ProjQ(P)={(P*Q)/(Q*Q)}Q

OrthQ(P)=P-ProjQ(P)

The Attempt at a Solution



First I get P=(1,-3,1) and Q=(-1,2,5)

ProjQ(P)
=(-2/30)*(-1,2,5)
={(1/15),(-2/15),(-1/3)}

That's correct, as far as the book is concerned.

Now, finding the orthogonal part is where I get held up.

I do this:
OrthQ(P)=
=(1,-3,1)-{(1/15),(-2/15),(-1/3)}
={14/15,(47/15),(4/3)}

Which is wrong. The book says the correct answer is: {(74/15),(32/15),(-2/3)}.

I'm at a complete loss as to how they got this. Any help is much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your formula for \text{Proj}_\textbf{Q}(\textbf{P}) should have \textbf{Q}\cdot\textbf{Q} in the denominator, not \textbf{P}\cdot\textbf{P}=11, although you seem to have done the calculations correctly.

I think the answer given in the back of your text for the second part is wrong, and they switched to using \textbf{P}=5\textbf{i}+2\textbf{j}-\textbf{k} by mistake in that 2nd part to get their (incorrect) answer.
 
Last edited:
winowmak3r said:
ProjQ(P)={(P*Q)/(P*P)}Q

I assume you mean

ProjQ(P)={(P*Q)/(Q*Q)}Q

which must be what you used since you got the right answer for ProjQ(P).

For OrthQ(P), I get (14, -43, 20)/15, which doesn't match either your answer or the book's.
 
Ah, yes. It should be QQ in the denominator rather than PP. I just translated it incorrectly to the forum, I've been working on this for a while now and am getting frustrated.

But if they're using P=5i+2j-k...that's not in the problem. It appears the textbook is incorrect?
 
Yes, the textbook is incorrect. However,as jbunnii pointed out, your answer is also a little off (pay close attention to your negative signs)
 
jbunniii said:
I assume you mean

ProjQ(P)={(P*Q)/(Q*Q)}Q

which must be what you used since you got the right answer for ProjQ(P).

For OrthQ(P), I get (14, -43, 20)/15, which doesn't match either your answer or the book's.

Alright, I realize now what I did was incorrect. OrthoP should be = (14, -43, 20)/15, I forgot that there was a -1/3 in ProjP which is why I didn't get 20/15 and added the -2 wrong to 45.

However, that's still not what's in the back of the book. Argh. I guess I can take my case to the prof in the morning. Thanks guys.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K